Skip to main content
added 2 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 212.7k
  • 48
  • 589
  • 2.3k

Glauber Surdarshan P$P$ Representation Normalizaion

I am studying Scully and Zubiary's quantum optics book currently, and I ran across their definition of the P representation as:

$$P(\alpha,\alpha^*) = Tr[\rho \delta(\alpha^* - a^\dagger) \delta(\alpha - a)] $$$$P(\alpha,\alpha^*) = Tr[\rho \delta(\alpha^* - a^\dagger) \delta(\alpha - a)]. $$

They then go on to say that you can see that it is normalized by finding $\int P(\alpha,\alpha^*) d^2\alpha = 1$. In my attempt to do this, I inserted two sets of coherent states on either side of the delta functions such that (after applying the cyclical property of the trace to move $\rho$ to the middle):

$$ P(\alpha, \alpha^*) = \sum_n \frac{1}{\pi^2} \int \langle n | \beta \rangle \langle \gamma | n \rangle \langle \beta | \rho | \gamma \rangle \delta(\alpha - \beta) \delta(\alpha^* - \gamma^*) d^2 \beta \hspace{1mm} d^2 \gamma $$$$ P(\alpha, \alpha^*) = \sum_n \frac{1}{\pi^2} \int \langle n | \beta \rangle \langle \gamma | n \rangle \langle \beta | \rho | \gamma \rangle \delta(\alpha - \beta) \delta(\alpha^* - \gamma^*) d^2 \beta \hspace{1mm} d^2 \gamma. $$

Upon integrating over the delta functions, I get:

$$P(\alpha, \alpha^*) = \sum_n \frac{1}{\pi^2} \langle \alpha | n \rangle \langle n | \alpha \rangle \langle \alpha | \rho | \alpha \rangle = \frac{1}{\pi^2} \langle \alpha | \rho | \alpha \rangle $$

Which I don't believe is correct. So if anyone can give me any pointers or tips on how to properly demonstrate the normalization here, that would be wonderful. Thanks in advance!

Glauber Surdarshan P Representation Normalizaion

I am studying Scully and Zubiary's quantum optics book currently, and I ran across their definition of the P representation as:

$$P(\alpha,\alpha^*) = Tr[\rho \delta(\alpha^* - a^\dagger) \delta(\alpha - a)] $$

They then go on to say that you can see that it is normalized by finding $\int P(\alpha,\alpha^*) d^2\alpha = 1$. In my attempt to do this, I inserted two sets of coherent states on either side of the delta functions such that (after applying the cyclical property of the trace to move $\rho$ to the middle):

$$ P(\alpha, \alpha^*) = \sum_n \frac{1}{\pi^2} \int \langle n | \beta \rangle \langle \gamma | n \rangle \langle \beta | \rho | \gamma \rangle \delta(\alpha - \beta) \delta(\alpha^* - \gamma^*) d^2 \beta \hspace{1mm} d^2 \gamma $$

Upon integrating over the delta functions, I get:

$$P(\alpha, \alpha^*) = \sum_n \frac{1}{\pi^2} \langle \alpha | n \rangle \langle n | \alpha \rangle \langle \alpha | \rho | \alpha \rangle = \frac{1}{\pi^2} \langle \alpha | \rho | \alpha \rangle $$

Which I don't believe is correct. So if anyone can give me any pointers or tips on how to properly demonstrate the normalization here, that would be wonderful. Thanks in advance!

Glauber Surdarshan $P$ Representation Normalizaion

I am studying Scully and Zubiary's quantum optics book currently, and I ran across their definition of the P representation as:

$$P(\alpha,\alpha^*) = Tr[\rho \delta(\alpha^* - a^\dagger) \delta(\alpha - a)]. $$

They then go on to say that you can see that it is normalized by finding $\int P(\alpha,\alpha^*) d^2\alpha = 1$. In my attempt to do this, I inserted two sets of coherent states on either side of the delta functions such that (after applying the cyclical property of the trace to move $\rho$ to the middle):

$$ P(\alpha, \alpha^*) = \sum_n \frac{1}{\pi^2} \int \langle n | \beta \rangle \langle \gamma | n \rangle \langle \beta | \rho | \gamma \rangle \delta(\alpha - \beta) \delta(\alpha^* - \gamma^*) d^2 \beta \hspace{1mm} d^2 \gamma. $$

Upon integrating over the delta functions, I get:

$$P(\alpha, \alpha^*) = \sum_n \frac{1}{\pi^2} \langle \alpha | n \rangle \langle n | \alpha \rangle \langle \alpha | \rho | \alpha \rangle = \frac{1}{\pi^2} \langle \alpha | \rho | \alpha \rangle $$

Which I don't believe is correct. So if anyone can give me any pointers or tips on how to properly demonstrate the normalization here, that would be wonderful. Thanks in advance!

Source Link
user132849
  • 339
  • 2
  • 9

Glauber Surdarshan P Representation Normalizaion

I am studying Scully and Zubiary's quantum optics book currently, and I ran across their definition of the P representation as:

$$P(\alpha,\alpha^*) = Tr[\rho \delta(\alpha^* - a^\dagger) \delta(\alpha - a)] $$

They then go on to say that you can see that it is normalized by finding $\int P(\alpha,\alpha^*) d^2\alpha = 1$. In my attempt to do this, I inserted two sets of coherent states on either side of the delta functions such that (after applying the cyclical property of the trace to move $\rho$ to the middle):

$$ P(\alpha, \alpha^*) = \sum_n \frac{1}{\pi^2} \int \langle n | \beta \rangle \langle \gamma | n \rangle \langle \beta | \rho | \gamma \rangle \delta(\alpha - \beta) \delta(\alpha^* - \gamma^*) d^2 \beta \hspace{1mm} d^2 \gamma $$

Upon integrating over the delta functions, I get:

$$P(\alpha, \alpha^*) = \sum_n \frac{1}{\pi^2} \langle \alpha | n \rangle \langle n | \alpha \rangle \langle \alpha | \rho | \alpha \rangle = \frac{1}{\pi^2} \langle \alpha | \rho | \alpha \rangle $$

Which I don't believe is correct. So if anyone can give me any pointers or tips on how to properly demonstrate the normalization here, that would be wonderful. Thanks in advance!