Timeline for Why do we say the resultant vector as the relative motion in this case?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2021 at 5:37 | vote | accept | S.M.T | ||
| Mar 29, 2021 at 5:36 | answer | added | imposter | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 29, 2021 at 5:32 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Mar 29, 2021 at 5:59 | |||||
| Mar 29, 2021 at 5:24 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited tags
|
| Mar 29, 2021 at 2:02 | comment | added | Physiker | Maybe there is. I havent heard that term before. | |
| Mar 29, 2021 at 1:45 | comment | added | S.M.T | Is there any method like “Minimum distance of approach “ used here ? @SarthakGirdhar | |
| Mar 29, 2021 at 1:42 | comment | added | Physiker | Acceleration is a vector quantity and thus follows vector laws. To car A, B will seem to accelerate west at 2 m/s^2 and accelerate north at 1m/s^2 which u add by pythagoras theorem. | |
| Mar 29, 2021 at 1:31 | history | asked | S.M.T | CC BY-SA 4.0 |