According to the Lorentz transformation formula for the electric field, we have:
$$ \mathbf E_\perp' = \gamma(\mathbf E_\perp+\mathbf v\times \mathbf B_\perp) $$
Since $\mathbf B=0$ in the rest frame, in the moving frame $\mathbf E$ becomes stronger by a factor of $\gamma$. We expectmight hope for these effects to cancel out. The size of the magnetic field generated is $|B_\perp| = \gamma v|E_\perp|/c^2$, by a similar Lorentz transformation law.
Lorentz force on the moving charge will be $qv|B_\perp|$, since the field is perpendicular to the direction of motion. So the overall force due to magnetic field is $\gamma |E_\perp| qv^2/c^2$. Meanwhile, the magnitude of the electric force on the charge isin the direction perpendicular to motion is $\gamma |E_\perp| q$. Since these are pointing in opposite directions, the net attractive force, perpendicular to the direction of motion, is:
$$ \gamma |E_\perp|q(1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}|E_\perp|q(1-v^2/c^2) = |E_\perp|q\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2} $$
ThisBut this is not a complete cancellation, the perpendicular electromagnetic force is still reduced in the moving frame. The only chancehope now is that maybe in the moving frame, ourthe insulating stick applies a force that isn't parallel to itself.
In the resting frame, the stick transmits a force $F$ between the two charges. The definition of force is $dp/dt$: the rate of flow of momentum. In the resting frame, both charges have 0 momentum at all times. So the net momentum change is 0. Some momentum is flowing through the electric field between the charges at a rate of $F$, and an equal and opposite quantity of momentum is flowing through the insulating stick, also at a rate of $F$.
Let's consider the change in force applied by the stick after our Lorentz transformation. In the rest frame, we have time coordinate $t$. In the moving frame, we have time coordinate $t' = \gamma(t-vx/c^2)$. At rest, $x=0$ at all times, so $t' = \gamma t$. This means that a small interval of time $dt$ in the rest frame corresponds to a slightly longer interval of time in the moving frame, $dt'=\gamma dt$. The momentum transferred in a time $dt$ is $dp = (Fdt\cos\alpha, Fdt\sin\alpha)$ in the rest frame. According to the transformation rule for 4 momentum, perpendicular momentum transferred remains unchanged while parallel momentum transferred scales by $\gamma$. So we have: $dp'=(\gamma Fdt\cos\alpha, Fdt\sin\alpha)$. Then:
$$ F' = \frac{dp'}{dt'} = \frac{\gamma Fdt\cos\alpha, Fdt\sin\alpha}{\gamma dt} = (F\cos\alpha, \frac{1}{\gamma}F\sin\alpha) $$
So the force exerted by the stick perpendicular to the direction of motion has been scaled by a factor of $1/\gamma$, just like the perpendicular electromagnetic force was, while parallel force remains the same. Mystery solved, but in a very strange way: The moving stick is exerting a force along a different axis than the one it's pointing in. But that's just special relativity for you. (Length contraction doesn't compensate for this, in fact it makes the stick point in a direction even farther fromless parallel to the directionforce it transfers force in!)