Skip to main content
25 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 27, 2021 at 21:17 review Close votes
Apr 1, 2021 at 3:06
Mar 27, 2021 at 20:31 comment added Norbert Schuch To start with, there's more than one uncertainty principle. E.g., one version states that e.g. position and momentum (expectation values) of a state cannot be simultaneously defined up to X. Another version considers the possibility to joinly measure e.g. position and momentum. This is not the same statement. And there are more versions.
Mar 27, 2021 at 20:12 history reopened 1__
Steeven
ZeroTheHero
GiorgioP-DoomsdayClockIsAt-90
Massimo Ortolano
Mar 24, 2021 at 20:41 review Reopen votes
Mar 27, 2021 at 20:16
Mar 24, 2021 at 19:27 history closed G. Smith
Cosmas Zachos
By Symmetry
Buzz
Jon Custer
Opinion-based
Mar 23, 2021 at 23:16 comment added Matt Timmermans time vs frequency is pretty easy to show graphically
Mar 23, 2021 at 14:23 answer added Deschele Schilder timeline score: -3
Mar 23, 2021 at 11:41 comment added Carl Witthoft "How to accurately state..." <-- this is begging for reflexive jokes. "I can tell you exactly what the Uncertainty Principle is but then you'd have zero understanding"
Mar 23, 2021 at 11:40 comment added BioPhysicist FWIW I still think this question should be closed as opinion based, even though some of the answers are pretty good.
Mar 23, 2021 at 11:02 comment added user541686 "If I were a teacher"... of what class? Is it a college class where they've seen Fourier transforms? Because then you can just illustrate it very vividly with time/frequency uncertainty, and then tell them this mathematical fact is physically true in quantum mechanics ("because position & momentum are in some sense Fourier transforms", or whatever..).
Mar 23, 2021 at 10:26 answer added GiorgioP-DoomsdayClockIsAt-90 timeline score: 9
Mar 23, 2021 at 6:55 comment added Hartmut Braun I gave an answer to a similar question at physics.stackexchange.com/a/577430/202379
Mar 23, 2021 at 6:51 history edited Peter Mortensen CC BY-SA 4.0
Copy edited (e.g. ref. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle>). Fixed the question formation - missing auxiliary (or helping) verb - see e.g. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4yWEt0OSpg&t=1m49s> (see also <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kS5NfSzXfrI> (QUASM)).
Mar 23, 2021 at 4:46 history became hot network question
Mar 22, 2021 at 23:35 history edited Urb CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 41 characters in body; edited title
Mar 22, 2021 at 23:09 answer added The_Sympathizer timeline score: 2
Mar 22, 2021 at 22:04 answer added Cleonis timeline score: 15
Mar 22, 2021 at 21:54 answer added Colin Fredericks timeline score: 13
Mar 22, 2021 at 21:29 comment added mmesser314 This video from 2blue1brown is pretty good. The more general uncertainty principle, beyond quantum
Mar 22, 2021 at 21:02 review Close votes
Mar 24, 2021 at 19:27
Mar 22, 2021 at 21:00 history edited 1__ CC BY-SA 4.0
clarifying
Mar 22, 2021 at 20:58 comment added ACuriousMind Related/possible duplicates (in the sense that the answers there contain the answer to this question): physics.stackexchange.com/q/114133/50583, physics.stackexchange.com/q/201580/50583, physics.stackexchange.com/q/24068/50583 and their many linked questions
Mar 22, 2021 at 20:51 history edited 1__ CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
Mar 22, 2021 at 20:51 comment added BioPhysicist Your post seems like a (correct IMO) criticism of how the HUP is explained and then a separate question tacked on at the end. I suggest focusing on asking your main question up front, and not making it look so subjective (e.g. the title of the post).
Mar 22, 2021 at 20:44 history asked 1__ CC BY-SA 4.0