Skip to main content
Became Hot Network Question
edited title
Link
Qmechanic
  • 212.7k
  • 48
  • 589
  • 2.3k

Deriving the work energy-energy theorem in three dimensions from NewtonsNewton's second law of motion and justifying moving around differentials

Deriving The Work Energy Theoremthe work energy theorem in Three Dimensions Fromthree dimensions from Newtons 2nd Law. Also, Justifying Moving Around Differentialssecond law of motion and justifying moving around differentials

added 1 character in body; edited title
Source Link
Byte _
  • 153
  • 6

Deriving Conservation of MechanicalThe Work Energy Theorem in Three Dimensions From Newtons 2nd Law. Also, Justifying Moving Around Differentials

I wanted to prove conservation ofthe work energy theorem in three dimensions starting from Newton's second law of motion. I am having some trouble understanding differential swapping and deriving the kinetic energy formula in three dimensions. Assuming $F_c$ is the sum of all conservative force and $F_{nc}$ is a non-conservative force, for one dimension I have the following.

$$F_{c}+F_{nc}=ma$$

$$\int_{x_{1}}^{x_{2}}F_{c}\ dx\ +\ \int_{x_{1}}^{x_{2}}F_{nc}\ dx\ =m\int_{x_{1}}^{x_{2}}adx$$

$$adx=\frac{dv}{dt}dx=\frac{dx}{dt}dv=vdv \; \label{*} \tag{*}$$

$$m\int_{v\left(x_{1}\right)}^{v\left(x_{2}\right)}vdv\ =\ \frac{1}{2}mv\left(x_{2}\right)^{2}-\frac{1}{2}mv\left(x_{1}\right)^{2}=KE_f-KE_i$$ Using $\frac{dU}{dx}=-F_{c}$, and assuming integrating $F_{nc}$ gives a change in energy $ΔW_{nc}$, we have, $$U_{i}-U_{f}\ +\ ΔW_{nc}=KE_{f}-KE_{i}.$$

In the manipulation to obtain equation $\eqref{*}$, why exactly are we allowed to swap the differentials? Is there a rigorous way to show why you're allowed to do that?

Moreover for the 3D case, assuming that an object is moving along a curve $C$, $$\vec{F_c}+\vec{F_{nc}}=m\vec{a},$$ $$\int_C \vec{F_c}\cdot d\vec{r} +\int_C \vec{F_{nc}}\cdot d\vec{r} = m\int_C \vec{a}\cdot d\vec{r},$$ and further using, $$\nabla U=-\vec{F_c}$$ $$\int_C \vec{F_c}\cdot d\vec{r}=-\int_C\nabla U\cdot d\vec{r} = U_i-U_f,$$we have $$U_{i}-U_{f}\ +\ ΔW_{nc} = m\int_C (a_x \hat{i}_x + a_y \hat{i}_y + a_z \hat{i}_z) \cdot d\vec{r}.$$

How exactly do we handle the final integral on the right? I’m sort of confused since $a$ is an acceleration field now, and I’m not sure if I can do the differential swap trick from before. Is $\vec{a}$ the time derivative of a velocity field now? Also on a different note, could that integral be evaluated using the fundamental theorem of line integrals?

The final result $KE_f-KE_i$ involves computing a value at the beginning and end of the curve (similar to what FTC of line integrals does). That's why I was asking. Thanks!

Deriving Conservation of Mechanical Energy in Three Dimensions From Newtons 2nd Law. Also, Justifying Moving Around Differentials

I wanted to prove conservation of energy in three dimensions starting from Newton's second law of motion. I am having some trouble understanding differential swapping and deriving the kinetic energy formula in three dimensions. Assuming $F_c$ is the sum of all conservative force and $F_{nc}$ is a non-conservative force, for one dimension I have the following.

$$F_{c}+F_{nc}=ma$$

$$\int_{x_{1}}^{x_{2}}F_{c}\ dx\ +\ \int_{x_{1}}^{x_{2}}F_{nc}\ dx\ =m\int_{x_{1}}^{x_{2}}adx$$

$$adx=\frac{dv}{dt}dx=\frac{dx}{dt}dv=vdv \; \label{*} \tag{*}$$

$$m\int_{v\left(x_{1}\right)}^{v\left(x_{2}\right)}vdv\ =\ \frac{1}{2}mv\left(x_{2}\right)^{2}-\frac{1}{2}mv\left(x_{1}\right)^{2}=KE_f-KE_i$$ Using $\frac{dU}{dx}=-F_{c}$, and assuming integrating $F_{nc}$ gives a change in energy $ΔW_{nc}$, we have, $$U_{i}-U_{f}\ +\ ΔW_{nc}=KE_{f}-KE_{i}.$$

In the manipulation to obtain equation $\eqref{*}$, why exactly are we allowed to swap the differentials? Is there a rigorous way to show why you're allowed to do that?

Moreover for the 3D case, assuming that an object is moving along a curve $C$, $$\vec{F_c}+\vec{F_{nc}}=m\vec{a},$$ $$\int_C \vec{F_c}\cdot d\vec{r} +\int_C \vec{F_{nc}}\cdot d\vec{r} = m\int_C \vec{a}\cdot d\vec{r},$$ and further using, $$\nabla U=-\vec{F_c}$$ $$\int_C \vec{F_c}\cdot d\vec{r}=-\int_C\nabla U\cdot d\vec{r} = U_i-U_f,$$we have $$U_{i}-U_{f}\ +\ ΔW_{nc} = m\int_C (a_x \hat{i}_x + a_y \hat{i}_y + a_z \hat{i}_z) \cdot d\vec{r}.$$

How exactly do we handle the final integral on the right? I’m sort of confused since $a$ is an acceleration field now, and I’m not sure if I can do the differential swap trick from before. Is $\vec{a}$ the time derivative of a velocity field now? Also on a different note, could that integral be evaluated using the fundamental theorem of line integrals?

The final result $KE_f-KE_i$ involves computing a value at the beginning and end of the curve (similar to what FTC of line integrals does). That's why I was asking. Thanks!

Deriving The Work Energy Theorem in Three Dimensions From Newtons 2nd Law. Also, Justifying Moving Around Differentials

I wanted to prove the work energy theorem in three dimensions starting from Newton's second law of motion. I am having some trouble understanding differential swapping and deriving the kinetic energy formula in three dimensions. Assuming $F_c$ is the sum of all conservative force and $F_{nc}$ is a non-conservative force, for one dimension I have the following.

$$F_{c}+F_{nc}=ma$$

$$\int_{x_{1}}^{x_{2}}F_{c}\ dx\ +\ \int_{x_{1}}^{x_{2}}F_{nc}\ dx\ =m\int_{x_{1}}^{x_{2}}adx$$

$$adx=\frac{dv}{dt}dx=\frac{dx}{dt}dv=vdv \; \label{*} \tag{*}$$

$$m\int_{v\left(x_{1}\right)}^{v\left(x_{2}\right)}vdv\ =\ \frac{1}{2}mv\left(x_{2}\right)^{2}-\frac{1}{2}mv\left(x_{1}\right)^{2}=KE_f-KE_i$$ Using $\frac{dU}{dx}=-F_{c}$, and assuming integrating $F_{nc}$ gives a change in energy $ΔW_{nc}$, we have, $$U_{i}-U_{f}\ +\ ΔW_{nc}=KE_{f}-KE_{i}.$$

In the manipulation to obtain equation $\eqref{*}$, why exactly are we allowed to swap the differentials? Is there a rigorous way to show why you're allowed to do that?

Moreover for the 3D case, assuming that an object is moving along a curve $C$, $$\vec{F_c}+\vec{F_{nc}}=m\vec{a},$$ $$\int_C \vec{F_c}\cdot d\vec{r} +\int_C \vec{F_{nc}}\cdot d\vec{r} = m\int_C \vec{a}\cdot d\vec{r},$$ and further using, $$\nabla U=-\vec{F_c}$$ $$\int_C \vec{F_c}\cdot d\vec{r}=-\int_C\nabla U\cdot d\vec{r} = U_i-U_f,$$we have $$U_{i}-U_{f}\ +\ ΔW_{nc} = m\int_C (a_x \hat{i}_x + a_y \hat{i}_y + a_z \hat{i}_z) \cdot d\vec{r}.$$

How exactly do we handle the final integral on the right? I’m sort of confused since $a$ is an acceleration field now, and I’m not sure if I can do the differential swap trick from before. Is $\vec{a}$ the time derivative of a velocity field now? Also on a different note, could that integral be evaluated using the fundamental theorem of line integrals?

The final result $KE_f-KE_i$ involves computing a value at the beginning and end of the curve (similar to what FTC of line integrals does). That's why I was asking. Thanks!

deleted 4 characters in body
Source Link
Byte _
  • 153
  • 6
Loading
grammatical edits and formatting changes and added tags
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Byte _
  • 153
  • 6
Loading