Timeline for Equivalence principle and rotating frames
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16 at 9:14 | comment | added | pabouk - Ukraine stay strong | Thank you. I just thought that something like that the OP wanted to hear (and me to). Some flat-earthers claim that Einstein said that on the Earth we cannot distinguish if the Earth is moving or stationary. :D | |
| Aug 16 at 0:05 | comment | added | Ján Lalinský | @pabouk-Ukrainestaystrong What does it mean that a non-rotating frame is equivalent to a rotating frame? Usually they are not considered equivalent, because equations of motion look different in rotating and non-rotating frames; non-rotating frames are preferred. | |
| Aug 15 at 18:22 | comment | added | pabouk - Ukraine stay strong | Is it possible to construct a non-rotating frame of reference which would be equivalent to a rotating frame of reference? Let's compare just limited regions of the frames. Can these regions contain the rotational axis like for example the whole Earth? | |
| Aug 2, 2023 at 13:00 | history | edited | Ján Lalinský | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 300 characters in body
|
| Feb 13, 2021 at 7:14 | vote | accept | l4teLearner | ||
| Feb 12, 2021 at 13:50 | history | edited | Ján Lalinský | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 433 characters in body
|
| Feb 12, 2021 at 13:45 | history | answered | Ján Lalinský | CC BY-SA 4.0 |