Timeline for No-interaction theorem in classical relativistic mechanics
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2021 at 6:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1437294990330322950 | ||
| Feb 16, 2021 at 2:41 | comment | added | user21299 | No idea -- I'm also mystified | |
| Feb 10, 2021 at 5:42 | comment | added | Aleksandr Artemev | Well, there're just some typos in that article here and there. Still, this requirement should also make sense in 2d, when space dimension index doesn't matter; if one could at least clarify the meaning of this requirement in this case, which is of particular interest to me, it would be very helpful. | |
| Feb 9, 2021 at 23:51 | comment | added | user21299 | In that paper $a$ labels the particles (1 to n) and their index $i$ labels space dimensions (1 to 3), so (1.2) says $\{q^a_i, K_j\}=q^a_i\{q^a_j, H\}$. But (1.2) contradicts (3.1) in that paper, so I guess we'll never know. | |
| Feb 9, 2021 at 21:48 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 40 characters in body
|
| Feb 9, 2021 at 21:31 | history | asked | Aleksandr Artemev | CC BY-SA 4.0 |