This is what I have so far.
We start with the definition that force is the change in momentum with respect to time. In the four dimensions of spacetime, this is:$$\Sigma F_i =\frac{dP}{d\tau}$$Where $\Sigma F_i$ is the sum of 4-forcesforces, both applied and inertial, $P$ is the 4-momentummomentum and $\tau$ is the proper time. For a constant mass system (non-relativistic), this is:$$\Sigma F_i =m\frac{dU}{d\tau}$$Where $U$ is the 4-Velocityvelocity. The 4 In spacetime, the velocity is a four-Velocityvelocity and is really the product of two tensors, the components and the basis vectors. Expanding, we get:$$\frac{dU}{d\tau}=\frac{d}{d\tau}\left(U^\lambda e_\lambda \right)=\frac{dU^\lambda}{d\tau}e_\lambda +U^\lambda\frac{de_\lambda}{d\tau}$$ The derivative of the basis vector with respect to the affine parameter is represented by the Christoffel Symbols, so the product of the tangent velocity of the fiduciary geodesic and the rate of change in the basis vector is (please provide the derivation if you consider it important):$$U^\lambda\frac{de_\lambda}{d\tau}=\Gamma_{\mu\nu}^\lambda U^\mu U^\nu e_\lambda$$ Substituting back in, the expression for the 4four-Accelerationacceleration becomes:$$\frac{dU}{d\tau}=\frac{dU^\lambda}{d\tau}e_\lambda +\Gamma_{\mu\nu}^\lambda U^\mu U^\nu e_\lambda$$$$\frac{dU}{d\tau}=\left(\frac{dU^\lambda}{d\tau}+\Gamma_{\mu\nu}^\lambda U^\mu U^\nu\right)e_\lambda$$Substituting back into the 4-force expressionsum of forces equation, we have:$$\Sigma F_i =m\left(\frac{dU^\lambda}{d\tau}+\Gamma_{\mu\nu}^\lambda U^\mu U^\nu\right)e_\lambda$$If the geometry of spacetime is flat, then the Christoffel symbols disappear and, for a non-relativistic, constant mass system, we have: $$a\equiv\frac{dU}{d\tau}$$ $$\Sigma F_i =ma$$If the spacetime is curved, we have:$$A\equiv\Gamma_{\mu\nu}^\lambda U^\mu U^\nu$$$$\Sigma F_i =m\left(a+A\right)$$Where $a$ is the result the applied force and $A$ is the acceleration of the pseudo (inertial) force of curvature.
I cobbled this together from several papers. I would appreciate any changes that make the notation and the descriptions more standard. In particular, I'm not sure of the treatment of the basis vector, $e^\lambda$ in all the steps.