Timeline for Comprehensive book on group theory for physicists?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
35 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 11 at 13:52 | history | unprotected | Buzz♦ | ||
Jan 25, 2023 at 14:57 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | 2018 notes by Noah Miller, Representation Theory & QM. | |
Jan 10, 2020 at 17:20 | answer | added | Cosmas Zachos | timeline score: 6 | |
Dec 6, 2018 at 15:23 | answer | added | Ooker | timeline score: 34 | |
Nov 18, 2018 at 18:43 | history | protected | AccidentalFourierTransform | ||
Nov 18, 2018 at 18:22 | answer | added | Gerson J Ferreira | timeline score: 1 | |
Sep 18, 2018 at 11:40 | answer | added | Ooker | timeline score: 2 | |
Sep 28, 2017 at 6:58 | answer | added | DanielC | timeline score: 5 | |
Sep 28, 2017 at 5:27 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags
|
|
Apr 8, 2016 at 2:45 | answer | added | Mark Weitzman | timeline score: 13 | |
Jun 21, 2015 at 5:20 | answer | added | Jony | timeline score: 14 | |
Dec 7, 2014 at 10:28 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Qmechanic♦ | ||
Dec 7, 2014 at 10:17 | answer | added | Fiat Lux | timeline score: 14 | |
Jun 25, 2014 at 13:20 | answer | added | user7757 | timeline score: 7 | |
May 15, 2014 at 21:26 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags
|
|
May 15, 2014 at 20:27 | answer | added | ZeroTheHero | timeline score: 4 | |
Mar 5, 2014 at 16:08 | history | wiki removed | Manishearth | ||
Mar 5, 2014 at 6:36 | history | notice added | Manishearth | Book Recommendation | |
Mar 5, 2014 at 2:50 | answer | added | el vieto | timeline score: 3 | |
Jul 17, 2013 at 0:52 | answer | added | Matt J. | timeline score: 3 | |
Jun 28, 2013 at 1:34 | answer | added | Selene Routley | timeline score: 5 | |
Jun 8, 2012 at 17:43 | answer | added | DJBunk | timeline score: 5 | |
Feb 14, 2012 at 18:36 | answer | added | mmdanziger | timeline score: 5 | |
Jan 16, 2012 at 7:05 | answer | added | joseph f. johnson | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 1, 2011 at 14:37 | history | edited | Piotr Migdal |
edited tags
|
|
Feb 28, 2011 at 21:49 | history | edited | spencer nelson |
edited tags
|
|
Feb 28, 2011 at 20:19 | answer | added | dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten | timeline score: 7 | |
Feb 28, 2011 at 19:46 | vote | accept | Lagerbaer | ||
Feb 28, 2011 at 19:29 | answer | added | Andy Bale | timeline score: 4 | |
Feb 28, 2011 at 17:23 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/42273802658385921 | ||
Feb 28, 2011 at 17:11 | answer | added | MBN | timeline score: 10 | |
Feb 28, 2011 at 17:04 | comment | added | Marek | Do you really want general group theory? I.e. theory of abstract groups, multiplication tables, classification of finite groups (using Lagrange's, Fermat's, Sylow's theorems, etc.), theory of presentations, uses of groups in number theory, etc.? Because if you just want to use group theory in physics then in my experience you won't need anything besides representations. See this question of mine over at MO: mathoverflow.net/q/56304 | |
Feb 28, 2011 at 16:58 | answer | added | Marek | timeline score: 8 | |
Feb 28, 2011 at 16:31 | answer | added | luksen | timeline score: 30 | |
Feb 28, 2011 at 16:28 | history | asked | Lagerbaer | CC BY-SA 2.5 |