Timeline for Simplified delayed choice quantum erazer experiment: is it possible to create an interference pattern at D0?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jun 19, 2023 at 0:55 | history | suggested | Duke William |
Added additional tags.
|
|
| Jun 18, 2023 at 22:04 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 19, 2023 at 0:55 | |||||
| May 24, 2023 at 17:10 | comment | added | Duke William | This question definitely needs a better answer. I hope someone may explain why there is no interference pattern in the simplified setup with more detailed clarification. Also why and what logic govern the filtering out of the interference pattern? | |
| Sep 9, 2022 at 16:16 | answer | added | Martin C. Martin | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 13, 2021 at 23:27 | answer | added | werinher | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 7, 2021 at 22:46 | comment | added | Harry Partridge | I was similarly confused the other day and I came across this answer which seems to indicate that you would not get an interference pattern: physics.stackexchange.com/questions/350945/…. I still don't fully understand it though, so hopefully someone can provide another explanation. | |
| Jan 26, 2021 at 12:31 | history | edited | Urb | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 149 characters in body
|
| Jan 26, 2021 at 12:11 | history | edited | Chantal Roth | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 232 characters in body
|
| Jan 26, 2021 at 10:35 | history | edited | Chantal Roth | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 136 characters in body
|
| Jan 26, 2021 at 10:27 | history | edited | Chantal Roth | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 200 characters in body
|
| Jan 26, 2021 at 10:20 | history | edited | Chantal Roth | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 200 characters in body
|
| Jan 26, 2021 at 10:09 | history | edited | Chantal Roth | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 385 characters in body
|
| Jan 26, 2021 at 9:16 | history | asked | Chantal Roth | CC BY-SA 4.0 |