Skip to main content
19 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 9, 2021 at 3:01 comment added Edouard In "Many Worlds In One", Vilenkin remarks that expansion differs from relative motion. However, as quoted in their preprint whose main title was "Expanding Confusion", Davis (of Lineweaver and Davis, cited in Pulsar's answer) had rejected the physicality of "spatial expansion" as any sort of force or drag. I'm making this comment mainly to help myself find Oktay Dogangun's helpful comment & Pulsar's answer, whose color-coded diagram is easier to follow than a couple of the 3 panels in Lineweaver & Davis's paper.
Sep 27, 2019 at 6:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1177463001747607554
Sep 26, 2019 at 20:36 answer added benrg timeline score: 7
Oct 13, 2018 at 0:49 answer added Rene Kail timeline score: 4
Apr 15, 2018 at 8:48 comment added Oktay Doğangün The expansion hasn't got a speed. It is a misnomer to say that it is a speed. It should be called expansion rate. It is not like two points having a relative speed, it is more like a scaling rate of the unit distance. If there were no masses in the universe we would not sense any expansion at all.
Feb 17, 2016 at 17:57 history edited John Rennie CC BY-SA 3.0
Clarify
Jan 25, 2014 at 21:20 history protected Qmechanic
May 22, 2013 at 20:31 comment added Qmechanic Possible duplicates: physics.stackexchange.com/q/26549/2451 and links therein.
May 17, 2013 at 23:48 comment added user10851 More related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/44386
May 8, 2013 at 9:59 answer added Pulsar timeline score: 103
Apr 14, 2013 at 18:41 vote accept cziko
Apr 14, 2013 at 18:41 vote accept cziko
Apr 14, 2013 at 18:41
Apr 14, 2013 at 18:41 vote accept cziko
Apr 14, 2013 at 18:41
Apr 9, 2013 at 11:53 history edited Qmechanic
edited tags
Apr 9, 2013 at 11:48 answer added John Rennie timeline score: 12
Apr 9, 2013 at 11:39 comment added John Rennie Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/20056
Apr 9, 2013 at 11:07 answer added Luboš Motl timeline score: 34
Apr 9, 2013 at 10:53 review First posts
Apr 9, 2013 at 10:57
Apr 9, 2013 at 10:33 history asked cziko CC BY-SA 3.0