Skip to main content
added 262 characters in body
Source Link
KF Gauss
  • 8.1k
  • 2
  • 26
  • 71

The resolution to this paradox is realizing that the electrons are originating from two different states ifdifferent initial states, one photo-emitted from surface A, $\vert \psi_A\rangle$, and the other surface B. That is, $\vert \psi_B\rangle$. Because the initial states for your two scenarios are different and, they naturally have different binding energies (i.e. different starting potential energies) so you expect they will have different kinetic energies after photoemission as well. Thus, there is no violation of energy conservation.

The resolution to this paradox is realizing that the electrons are originating from two different states if photo-emitted from surface A and surface B. That is, the initial states for your two scenarios are different and have different binding energies.

The resolution to this paradox is realizing that the electrons are originating from two different initial states, one photo-emitted from surface A, $\vert \psi_A\rangle$, and the other surface B, $\vert \psi_B\rangle$. Because the initial states for your two scenarios are different, they naturally have different binding energies (i.e. different starting potential energies) so you expect they will have different kinetic energies after photoemission as well. Thus, there is no violation of energy conservation.

Source Link
KF Gauss
  • 8.1k
  • 2
  • 26
  • 71

The resolution to this paradox is realizing that the electrons are originating from two different states if photo-emitted from surface A and surface B. That is, the initial states for your two scenarios are different and have different binding energies.