Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 31, 2020 at 16:27 comment added Bob D Let's find out.
Dec 31, 2020 at 16:20 comment added Chet Miller @BobD Well, this is just your judgment. What does the OP say?
Dec 31, 2020 at 16:11 comment added Bob D Yes you proved it in the example for a reversible vs irreversible isothermal process, but I feel you didn't give the knockout punch, which is to explicitly state that it proves work is not a state function. Moreover, to state that work is never a state function regardless of the process.
Dec 31, 2020 at 15:59 comment added Chet Miller @BobD To prove that the OP is wrong, all that needs to be done is provide an example of two different isothermal paths between the same two isothermal equilibrium end states that gives different values for the amount of work. This is done in the example I provided in which the expansion work for the reversible path is greater than for a specified irreversible work.
Dec 31, 2020 at 15:00 comment added Bob D But the OP keeps insisting that work can be a state function. See comments below. You haven't addressed that.
Dec 31, 2020 at 13:10 history edited Chet Miller CC BY-SA 4.0
added 748 characters in body
Dec 30, 2020 at 19:05 history answered Chet Miller CC BY-SA 4.0