Timeline for "Inverse" $N$-body problem [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 4, 2020 at 19:55 | history | closed |
Buzz♦ Nikita Jon Custer GiorgioP-DoomsdayClockIsAt-90 Qmechanic♦ |
Needs details or clarity | |
Dec 1, 2020 at 1:11 | vote | accept | Vladislav Bezhentsev | ||
Dec 1, 2020 at 0:59 | comment | added | Vladislav Bezhentsev | @jacob1729 Let's assume that the initial conditions for the $(N+1)$th particle are unknown. | |
Dec 1, 2020 at 0:14 | answer | added | atarasenko | timeline score: 3 | |
Dec 1, 2020 at 0:09 | comment | added | jacob1729 | Are you given initial conditions for the $N+1$st particle? If so then the first $N$ just define a time dependent potential $V(x,t)$ and you have a 1 body problem. | |
Nov 30, 2020 at 23:49 | history | edited | Vladislav Bezhentsev | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fix typo
|
Nov 30, 2020 at 23:15 | review | Close votes | |||
Dec 4, 2020 at 19:55 | |||||
Nov 30, 2020 at 23:09 | comment | added | Vladislav Bezhentsev | @Qmechanic♦ No, I don't make such assumption. Is it even meaningful to make such assumptions in newtonian mechanics? Would not it imply that the force acting on the $(N+1)$th body is zero? | |
Nov 30, 2020 at 22:55 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | Are you assuming that the $(N+1)$th particle has infinitesimally small mass? | |
Nov 30, 2020 at 22:52 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 10 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
Nov 30, 2020 at 22:30 | review | First posts | |||
Nov 30, 2020 at 22:59 | |||||
Nov 30, 2020 at 22:27 | history | asked | Vladislav Bezhentsev | CC BY-SA 4.0 |