Timeline for I don't understand Ampere's circuital law
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2020 at 8:42 | history | edited | Thomas Fritsch | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 35 characters in body
|
| Nov 30, 2020 at 17:50 | comment | added | llama | @TanfeexUlhaqq something that might help: Gauss' and Ampere's laws are always true but not always useful (or at least simple). Ampere's law is useful to find the field of a single infinite wire because we know that the field is always pointing azimuthally due to symmetry, but introducing the second wire breaks this simple symmetry. | |
| Nov 30, 2020 at 14:19 | comment | added | Thomas Fritsch | @TanfeexUlhaqq The resasoning for Gauss's law will be very similar. Instead of path integrals $\oint_\text{loop} \mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r})d\mathbf{l}$ you need to consider surface integrals $\oint_\text{surface} \mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r})d\mathbf{S}$. | |
| Nov 30, 2020 at 14:00 | history | edited | Thomas Fritsch | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
| Nov 30, 2020 at 13:53 | comment | added | TanfeexUlhaqq | Alright atleast now I understand that it has something to do with the way we integrate things. But I'm still confused about the Guass's law. Anyway thanks for putting such an effort, trying to clear my doubt. | |
| Nov 30, 2020 at 13:45 | history | edited | Thomas Fritsch | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 18 characters in body
|
| Nov 30, 2020 at 9:58 | history | answered | Thomas Fritsch | CC BY-SA 4.0 |