Skip to main content
Remove acronym from title
Source Link

Feynman Lectures Chapter 4.2 (FLCH42NO4): Understanding the obtainment of free power

FLCH42 stands for Feynman Lectures Chapter 4.2, known to frequently confuse budding physicists. This is the fourth in a personal series of questions I had about the chapter.

Excerpt:

Call this reversible machine, Machine A. Suppose this particular reversible machine lifts the three-unit weight a distance distance X. Then suppose we have another machine, Machine B, which is not necessarily reversible, which also lowers a unit unit weight a unit distance, but which lifts three units a distance Y. We can now prove that Y is not higher than X; that that is, it is impossible to build a machine that will lift a weight any higher than it will be lifted by a reversible machine machine. Let us see why. Let us suppose that Y were higher than X. We take a one-unit weight and lower it one unit height height with Machine B, and that lifts the three-unit weight up a distance Y. Then we could lower the weight from Y to X X, obtaining free power, and use the reversible Machine A, running backwards, to lower the three-unit weight a distance distance X and lift the one-unit weight by one unit height.

I understand reductio ad absurdum in general, so that is not the issue. The "obtaining free power" is where I got lost. How is this free power? He kind of implies that there is an external force applied to the machine when he says "we could lower the weight from Y to X".

In addition, I struggle to understand his explanation visually. When he says to use the reversible Machine A that runs "backwards", does he mean that someone picks up the three-unit weight with their hands and places it on the balance pan on Machine A?

Feynman Lectures Chapter 4.2 (FLCH42NO4): Understanding the obtainment of free power

FLCH42 stands for Feynman Lectures Chapter 4.2, known to frequently confuse budding physicists. This is the fourth in a personal series of questions I had about the chapter.

Excerpt:

Call this reversible machine, Machine A. Suppose this particular reversible machine lifts the three-unit weight a distance X. Then suppose we have another machine, Machine B, which is not necessarily reversible, which also lowers a unit weight a unit distance, but which lifts three units a distance Y. We can now prove that Y is not higher than X; that is, it is impossible to build a machine that will lift a weight any higher than it will be lifted by a reversible machine. Let us see why. Let us suppose that Y were higher than X. We take a one-unit weight and lower it one unit height with Machine B, and that lifts the three-unit weight up a distance Y. Then we could lower the weight from Y to X, obtaining free power, and use the reversible Machine A, running backwards, to lower the three-unit weight a distance X and lift the one-unit weight by one unit height.

I understand reductio ad absurdum in general, so that is not the issue. The "obtaining free power" is where I got lost. How is this free power? He kind of implies that there is an external force applied to the machine when he says "we could lower the weight from Y to X".

In addition, I struggle to understand his explanation visually. When he says to use the reversible Machine A that runs "backwards", does he mean that someone picks up the three-unit weight with their hands and places it on the balance pan on Machine A?

Feynman Lectures Chapter 4.2: Understanding the obtainment of free power

Excerpt:

Call this reversible machine, Machine A. Suppose this particular reversible machine lifts the three-unit weight a distance X. Then suppose we have another machine, Machine B, which is not necessarily reversible, which also lowers a unit weight a unit distance, but which lifts three units a distance Y. We can now prove that Y is not higher than X; that is, it is impossible to build a machine that will lift a weight any higher than it will be lifted by a reversible machine. Let us see why. Let us suppose that Y were higher than X. We take a one-unit weight and lower it one unit height with Machine B, and that lifts the three-unit weight up a distance Y. Then we could lower the weight from Y to X, obtaining free power, and use the reversible Machine A, running backwards, to lower the three-unit weight a distance X and lift the one-unit weight by one unit height.

I understand reductio ad absurdum in general, so that is not the issue. The "obtaining free power" is where I got lost. How is this free power? He kind of implies that there is an external force applied to the machine when he says "we could lower the weight from Y to X".

In addition, I struggle to understand his explanation visually. When he says to use the reversible Machine A that runs "backwards", does he mean that someone picks up the three-unit weight with their hands and places it on the balance pan on Machine A?

I had to click into the question to find out what that unusual acronym means. This wastes a small amount of my time which, don't forget, I give freely.
Link
garyp
  • 22.5k
  • 1
  • 45
  • 87

FLCH42NO4 Feynman Lectures Chapter 4.2 (FLCH42NO4): Understanding the obtainment of free power

Source Link

FLCH42NO4: Understanding the obtainment of free power

FLCH42 stands for Feynman Lectures Chapter 4.2, known to frequently confuse budding physicists. This is the fourth in a personal series of questions I had about the chapter.

Excerpt:

Call this reversible machine, Machine A. Suppose this particular reversible machine lifts the three-unit weight a distance X. Then suppose we have another machine, Machine B, which is not necessarily reversible, which also lowers a unit weight a unit distance, but which lifts three units a distance Y. We can now prove that Y is not higher than X; that is, it is impossible to build a machine that will lift a weight any higher than it will be lifted by a reversible machine. Let us see why. Let us suppose that Y were higher than X. We take a one-unit weight and lower it one unit height with Machine B, and that lifts the three-unit weight up a distance Y. Then we could lower the weight from Y to X, obtaining free power, and use the reversible Machine A, running backwards, to lower the three-unit weight a distance X and lift the one-unit weight by one unit height.

I understand reductio ad absurdum in general, so that is not the issue. The "obtaining free power" is where I got lost. How is this free power? He kind of implies that there is an external force applied to the machine when he says "we could lower the weight from Y to X".

In addition, I struggle to understand his explanation visually. When he says to use the reversible Machine A that runs "backwards", does he mean that someone picks up the three-unit weight with their hands and places it on the balance pan on Machine A?