Skip to main content
26 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 7, 2022 at 5:20 review Suggested edits
Dec 7, 2022 at 7:36
Dec 6, 2022 at 23:26 answer added bpl1960 timeline score: 0
Oct 21, 2020 at 16:29 comment added TCooper @törzsmókus Thanks, I know my understanding is rudimentary, but that's why I'm here to learn
Oct 21, 2020 at 10:48 comment added törzsmókus one of my favourite teacher said (and I often repeat): there are no dumb questions, just unasked ones
Oct 21, 2020 at 7:40 comment added Luaan @TCooper Hydroelectric would be entirely dissipated as heat, ultimately radiated at very long wavelenghts - there's potential to decrease the temperature increase from that. Wind is trickier - it depends a lot on how wind plants affect atmospheric mixing an all that, and I haven't found any nice studies of that in a quick search. Photovoltaics are probably the worst - they take short wavelength radiation and change it into long wavelength, which means it takes longer to re-radiate back to space, not to mention that the atmosphere is pretty transparent to visible light. Solar thermal are best.
Oct 21, 2020 at 2:51 answer added Josh timeline score: 0
Oct 21, 2020 at 0:15 comment added user65081 @TCooper my comment meant that any green energy would have ended up wasted into heat by friction, or absorption/reemission. So using more green energy should not contribute much to global warming.
Oct 20, 2020 at 23:32 comment added TCooper @Wolphramjonny Doesn't your question's answer depend entirely on the source of energy? Solar isn't the same as hydroelectric isn't the same as wind isn't the same as natural gas isn't the same as coal isn't the same as... you get the idea. i.e. hydro electric would mostly just be maintained as kinetic energy with little to no change in heat, solar would be almost strictly heat, I have no idea for natural gas... please correct me if I'm wrong but I think you've oversimplified.
Oct 20, 2020 at 19:31 answer added cmaster - reinstate monica timeline score: 8
Oct 20, 2020 at 17:58 answer added Jason Goemaat timeline score: 2
Oct 20, 2020 at 15:19 answer added Andrew Steane timeline score: 3
Oct 20, 2020 at 14:35 history edited Peter Mortensen CC BY-SA 4.0
Copy edited (e.g. ref. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming>, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_law_of_thermodynamics>, and <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renewable_energy>).
Oct 20, 2020 at 13:40 comment added Matthew So, your solar panel converts sunlight to electricity, which is eventually converted to heat. Just what do you think was happening to that sunlight if you didn't convert it to electricity?
Oct 19, 2020 at 23:14 answer added Sascha timeline score: 3
Oct 19, 2020 at 18:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1318250597506744325
Oct 19, 2020 at 9:36 answer added marshal craft timeline score: 1
Oct 19, 2020 at 8:09 answer added Schwern timeline score: 11
Oct 19, 2020 at 7:24 comment added jkej Possible duplicate
Oct 19, 2020 at 4:25 history became hot network question
Oct 18, 2020 at 22:21 answer added Eddy timeline score: 21
Oct 18, 2020 at 22:07 answer added David White timeline score: -1
Oct 18, 2020 at 22:05 answer added joseph h timeline score: 15
Oct 18, 2020 at 22:04 comment added user65081 what would have happened to the same energy if it was not "wasted on heat" by humans?
Oct 18, 2020 at 21:50 answer added Peeyush Kushwaha timeline score: 4
Oct 18, 2020 at 20:21 review First posts
Oct 18, 2020 at 20:57
Oct 18, 2020 at 20:21 history asked corius CC BY-SA 4.0