Timeline for Prove: $(\Delta x)(\Delta \lambda) \geq \frac{\lambda^2}{4\pi}$
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 15, 2023 at 10:30 | comment | added | Andrew | @asmaier If that were the case, you would allow negative values on standard deviations for $k$, since $\lambda > 0$ and $\Delta \lambda > 0$. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propagation_of_uncertainty#Simplification for the general rule. | |
Apr 14, 2023 at 22:26 | comment | added | asmaier | @AndreasMastronikolis Shouldn't $\Delta k = - \frac{2\pi}{\lambda^2} \Delta\lambda$ ? Did you forget the minus sign? | |
Oct 7, 2020 at 4:12 | history | edited | user276504 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
Oct 7, 2020 at 0:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1313630204158447616 | ||
Oct 6, 2020 at 23:39 | answer | added | John Dumancic | timeline score: 2 | |
Oct 6, 2020 at 22:14 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags
|
|
Oct 6, 2020 at 21:03 | comment | added | Andrew | I hesitate to answer the question because of the second part. But here is how I am thinking. The De Broglie hypothesis asserts: $$p = \hbar k \text{ with } k = \frac{2 \pi}{\lambda}$$ Thus, $$\Delta p = \hbar \Delta k \text{ and } \Delta k= \frac{2 \pi}{\lambda^2} \Delta \lambda$$ So, finally we have: $$\Delta x \cdot \Delta p \geq \frac{\hbar}{2} \Longrightarrow \Delta x \Delta k \geq \frac{1}{2} \Longrightarrow \Delta x \cdot \Delta \lambda \geq \frac{\lambda^2}{4 \pi}$$ | |
Oct 6, 2020 at 20:36 | review | First posts | |||
Oct 6, 2020 at 22:11 | |||||
Oct 6, 2020 at 20:33 | history | edited | G. Smith | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
Oct 6, 2020 at 20:31 | history | asked | user276504 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |