Skip to main content
edited body
Source Link
Ankit
  • 8.5k
  • 2
  • 31
  • 82

Why is it necessary to burn the hydrogen fuel coming out of the engine for the lift of rockets?

If it is done to create a greater reaction force on the rocket then why can't we doget the same lift with just adjusting the speed of the hydrogen gas going out of the engine like we can release them at a great pressure (and also by adjusting the size of the nozzle opening) and thus at a greater speed?

Is it possible for rockets to fly without burning the fuel and just releasing the fuel with a great force? (I know the rockets are too massive . ).

How does the ISP of the ordinary rocket engines compare with the one in my question  ? Most of the answers have done the comparison (and a great thanks for that), but help me with the numerical difference in the ISP's.

(Compare it using any desired values of the amount of fuel and other required things for taking off.)

Why is it necessary to burn the hydrogen fuel coming out of the engine for the lift of rockets?

If it is done to create a greater reaction force on the rocket then why can't we do the same lift with just adjusting the speed of the hydrogen gas going out of the engine like we can release them at a great pressure (and also by adjusting the size of the nozzle opening) and thus at a greater speed?

Is it possible for rockets to fly without burning the fuel and just releasing the fuel with a great force? (I know the rockets are too massive . )

How does the ISP of the ordinary rocket engines compare with the one in my question? Most of the answers have done the comparison (and a great thanks for that), but help me with the numerical difference in the ISP's.

(Compare it using any desired values of the amount of fuel and other required things for taking off.)

Why is it necessary to burn the hydrogen fuel coming out of the engine for the lift of rockets?

If it is done to create a greater reaction force on the rocket then why can't we get the same lift with just adjusting the speed of the hydrogen gas going out of the engine like we can release them at a great pressure (and also by adjusting the size of the nozzle opening) and thus at a greater speed?

Is it possible for rockets to fly without burning the fuel and just releasing the fuel with a great force? (I know the rockets are too massive).

How does the ISP of the ordinary rocket engines compare with the one in my question  ? Most of the answers have done the comparison (and a great thanks for that), but help me with the numerical difference in the ISP's.

(Compare it using any desired values of the amount of fuel and other required things for taking off.)

edited title
Link
Ankit
  • 8.5k
  • 2
  • 31
  • 82

Can rockets fly without burning any fuel with the help of gases under extreme pressure only?

Tweeted twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1303211483346735105
deleted 4 characters in body
Source Link

Why is it necessary to burn the hydrogen fuel coming out of the engine for the lift of the rockets?

If it is done to create a greater reaction force on the rocket then why can't we do the same lift with just adjusting the speed of the hydrogen gas going out of the engine like we can release them at a great pressure (and also by adjusting the size of the nozzle opening) and thus at a greater speed?

Is it possible for rockets to fly without burning the fuel and just releasing the fuel with a great force? (I know the rockets are too massive . )

How does the ISP of the ordinary rocket engines compare with the one in my question? Most of the answers have done the comparison (and a great thanks for that), but help me with the numerical difference in the ISP's.

(Compare it using any desired values of the amount of fuel and other required things for taking off.)

Why is it necessary to burn the hydrogen fuel coming out of the engine for the lift of the rockets?

If it is done to create a greater reaction force on the rocket then why can't we do the same lift with just adjusting the speed of the hydrogen gas going out of the engine like we can release them at a great pressure (and also by adjusting the size of the nozzle opening) and thus at a greater speed?

Is it possible for rockets to fly without burning the fuel and just releasing the fuel with a great force? (I know the rockets are too massive . )

How does the ISP of the ordinary rocket engines compare with the one in my question? Most of the answers have done the comparison (and a great thanks for that), but help me with the numerical difference in the ISP's.

(Compare it using any desired values of the amount of fuel and other required things for taking off.)

Why is it necessary to burn the hydrogen fuel coming out of the engine for the lift of rockets?

If it is done to create a greater reaction force on the rocket then why can't we do the same lift with just adjusting the speed of the hydrogen gas going out of the engine like we can release them at a great pressure (and also by adjusting the size of the nozzle opening) and thus at a greater speed?

Is it possible for rockets to fly without burning the fuel and just releasing the fuel with a great force? (I know the rockets are too massive . )

How does the ISP of the ordinary rocket engines compare with the one in my question? Most of the answers have done the comparison (and a great thanks for that), but help me with the numerical difference in the ISP's.

(Compare it using any desired values of the amount of fuel and other required things for taking off.)

deleted 25 characters in body
Source Link
Ankit
  • 8.5k
  • 2
  • 31
  • 82
Loading
deleted 3 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
Mod Moved Comments To Chat
Copy edited (e.g. ref. <https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/4645/is-it-ever-correct-to-have-a-space-before-a-question-or-exclamation-mark#comment206109_4645> and <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specific_impulse>). Removed meta information (this belongs in comments).
Source Link
Peter Mortensen
  • 2.4k
  • 2
  • 19
  • 25
Loading
added 261 characters in body
Source Link
Ankit
  • 8.5k
  • 2
  • 31
  • 82
Loading
deleted 62 characters in body
Source Link
Ankit
  • 8.5k
  • 2
  • 31
  • 82
Loading
edited tags
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 213.1k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k
Loading
edited title
Link
Ankit
  • 8.5k
  • 2
  • 31
  • 82
Loading
edited title
Link
Ankit
  • 8.5k
  • 2
  • 31
  • 82
Loading
added 151 characters in body
Source Link
Ankit
  • 8.5k
  • 2
  • 31
  • 82
Loading
Became Hot Network Question
Source Link
Ankit
  • 8.5k
  • 2
  • 31
  • 82
Loading