Skip to main content
added 134 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
DilithiumMatrix
  • 14.3k
  • 2
  • 41
  • 71

I've been reading that the results from the Planck satellitePlanck satellite constrain a number called the "scalar spectral index" to be 0.96 rather than 1 at the 5-sigma level.

This is supposed to be big news, but I don't understand why (my ignorance, of course).

For instance, with an index of 0.96, can we say how many e-foldings occured during inflation inflation? What else does it tell us  ?

I've been reading that the results from the Planck satellite constrain a number called the "scalar spectral index" to be 0.96 rather than 1 at the 5-sigma level.

This is supposed to be big news, but I don't understand why (my ignorance, of course).

For instance, with an index of 0.96, can we say how many e-foldings occured during inflation ? What else does it tell us  ?

I've been reading that the results from the Planck satellite constrain a number called the "scalar spectral index" to be 0.96 rather than 1 at the 5-sigma level.

This is supposed to be big news, but I don't understand why (my ignorance, of course).

For instance, with an index of 0.96, can we say how many e-foldings occured during inflation? What else does it tell us?

Source Link
Cosmonut
  • 61
  • 1
  • 2

Inflation and scalar spectral index

I've been reading that the results from the Planck satellite constrain a number called the "scalar spectral index" to be 0.96 rather than 1 at the 5-sigma level.

This is supposed to be big news, but I don't understand why (my ignorance, of course).

For instance, with an index of 0.96, can we say how many e-foldings occured during inflation ? What else does it tell us ?