Skip to main content
added 56 characters in body
Source Link
G. Smith
  • 52.2k
  • 4
  • 85
  • 154

Does time run slower at the center of a massive object?

Yes.

Gravitational time dilation depends on the value of the Newtonian gravitational potential, not on the gravitational acceleration. The lower the potential, the greater the time dilation. The dependence is linear when the absolute value of the Newtonian potential is much less than $c^2$, which is the case for planets and stars. When it becomes comparable to $c^2$, the concept of a Newtonian gravitational potential is no longer particularly useful.

The Newtonian gravitational potential at the center of a sphere of uniform density is more negative by a factor of 3/2 than the potential at the surface, causing greater time dilation at the center by approximately the same factor.

Does time run slower at the center of a massive object?

Yes.

Gravitational time dilation depends on the value of the Newtonian gravitational potential, not on the gravitational acceleration. The dependence is linear when the absolute value of the Newtonian potential is much less than $c^2$, which is the case for planets and stars. When it becomes comparable to $c^2$, the concept of a Newtonian gravitational potential is no longer particularly useful.

The Newtonian gravitational potential at the center of a sphere of uniform density is more negative by a factor of 3/2 than the potential at the surface, causing greater time dilation at the center by approximately the same factor.

Does time run slower at the center of a massive object?

Yes.

Gravitational time dilation depends on the value of the Newtonian gravitational potential, not on the gravitational acceleration. The lower the potential, the greater the time dilation. The dependence is linear when the absolute value of the Newtonian potential is much less than $c^2$, which is the case for planets and stars. When it becomes comparable to $c^2$, the concept of a Newtonian gravitational potential is no longer particularly useful.

The Newtonian gravitational potential at the center of a sphere of uniform density is more negative by a factor of 3/2 than the potential at the surface, causing greater time dilation at the center by approximately the same factor.

added 109 characters in body
Source Link
G. Smith
  • 52.2k
  • 4
  • 85
  • 154

Does time run slower at the center of a massive object?

Yes.

Gravitational time dilation depends on the value of the Newtonian gravitational potential, not on the gravitational acceleration. (TheThe dependence is linear when the absolute value of the Newtonian potential is much less than $c^2$, which is the case for planets and stars.) When it becomes comparable to $c^2$, the concept of a Newtonian gravitational potential is no longer particularly useful.

The Newtonian gravitational potential at the center of a sphere of uniform density is more negative by a factor of 3/2 than the potential at the surface, causing greater time dilation at the center by approximately the same factor.

Does time run slower at the center of a massive object?

Yes.

Gravitational time dilation depends on the value of the Newtonian gravitational potential, not on the gravitational acceleration. (The dependence is linear when the absolute value of the Newtonian potential is much less than $c^2$, which is the case for planets and stars.) The gravitational potential at the center of a sphere of uniform density is more negative by a factor of 3/2 than the potential at the surface, causing greater time dilation at the center by approximately the same factor.

Does time run slower at the center of a massive object?

Yes.

Gravitational time dilation depends on the value of the Newtonian gravitational potential, not on the gravitational acceleration. The dependence is linear when the absolute value of the Newtonian potential is much less than $c^2$, which is the case for planets and stars. When it becomes comparable to $c^2$, the concept of a Newtonian gravitational potential is no longer particularly useful.

The Newtonian gravitational potential at the center of a sphere of uniform density is more negative by a factor of 3/2 than the potential at the surface, causing greater time dilation at the center by approximately the same factor.

added 80 characters in body
Source Link
G. Smith
  • 52.2k
  • 4
  • 85
  • 154

Does time run slower at the center of a massive object?

Yes, approximately 50% slower than at the surface.

Gravitational time dilation depends on the value of the Newtonian gravitational potential, not on the gravitational acceleration. (The dependence is linear when the absolute value of the Newtonian potential is much less than $c^2$, which is the case for planets and stars.) The gravitational potential at the center of a sphere of uniform density is more negative by a factor of 3/2 than the potential at the surface, causing greater time dilation at the center by approximately the same factor.

Does time run slower at the center of a massive object?

Yes, approximately 50% slower than at the surface.

Gravitational time dilation depends on the value of the Newtonian gravitational potential, not on the gravitational acceleration. (The dependence is linear when the absolute value of the Newtonian potential is much less than $c^2$, which is the case for planets and stars.) The gravitational potential at the center of a sphere of uniform density is more negative by a factor of 3/2 than the potential at the surface, causing greater time dilation at the center by approximately the same factor.

Does time run slower at the center of a massive object?

Yes.

Gravitational time dilation depends on the value of the Newtonian gravitational potential, not on the gravitational acceleration. (The dependence is linear when the absolute value of the Newtonian potential is much less than $c^2$, which is the case for planets and stars.) The gravitational potential at the center of a sphere of uniform density is more negative by a factor of 3/2 than the potential at the surface, causing greater time dilation at the center by approximately the same factor.

added 80 characters in body
Source Link
G. Smith
  • 52.2k
  • 4
  • 85
  • 154
Loading
added 80 characters in body
Source Link
G. Smith
  • 52.2k
  • 4
  • 85
  • 154
Loading
Source Link
G. Smith
  • 52.2k
  • 4
  • 85
  • 154
Loading