Timeline for How to derive the formula for the quantum Hamiltonian $\hat H(\hat P,\hat Q)$ in terms of the classical $H(q,p)$, via Weyl Ordering?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Sep 26, 2021 at 20:58 | history | suggested | Physor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Display math mode
|
Sep 26, 2021 at 19:56 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Sep 26, 2021 at 20:58 | |||||
Mar 20, 2013 at 8:04 | comment | added | David Bar Moshe | @Ome cont. Please see also the following essay on the subject by Terence Tao: terrytao.wordpress.com/2012/10/07/… | |
Mar 20, 2013 at 8:01 | comment | added | David Bar Moshe | @Ome Please see the following concise review: docs.google.com/…. | |
Mar 20, 2013 at 7:56 | comment | added | David Bar Moshe | @Ome The variables x and k are just dummy integration variables. The integration variables are between minus and plus infinity (This is just a Fourier transform). | |
Mar 19, 2013 at 18:07 | comment | added | rainman | $\int {dx\over2\pi}{dk\over2\pi} e^{ixP + ikQ} \int dpdqe^{-ixp-ikq} (sq+tp)^n =(sQ+tP)^n $ @David Bar Moshe: In this equation what are the x and k? In fact, in my question there are also x and p. What are they in that context? For integration wrt x an k what are the upper and lower limits? Can you please write it explicitly? | |
Mar 19, 2013 at 17:05 | comment | added | rainman | Can you give me a reference of Weyl ordering and related stuffs? | |
Mar 19, 2013 at 12:36 | history | answered | David Bar Moshe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |