Skip to main content
added 4 characters in body
Source Link
Bhavay
  • 1.7k
  • 2
  • 14
  • 26

In many introductory books on electrostatics, you can find the statement that the field inside a conducting shell is zero if there are no charges within the shell. For example, if we place an uncharged conducting sphere in a uniform electric field we would get something like this:

Field

For simplicity, I have drawn a uniform external field and a spherical shell, but the internal field is zero for any external field and any shape of the shell.

We know the field in the metal of the conductor is zero, so the external field must induce a charge separation in the conductor and this charge separation produces a field that cancels out the external field within the metal of the shell (shaded blue in the diagram). However, there is no obvious reason why the field should also be canceled to zero in the interior of the shell.

Although it is widely stated in introductions to electrostatics that the field is zero in the interior of the shell I cannot find proof of this. So the questionquestion is how we prove that field inside the shell is always zero whatever the external field and shape of the shell?

In many introductory books on electrostatics, you can find the statement that the field inside a conducting shell is zero if there are no charges within the shell. For example, if we place an uncharged conducting sphere in a uniform electric field we would get something like this:

Field

For simplicity, I have drawn a uniform external field and a spherical shell, but the internal field is zero for any external field and any shape of the shell.

We know the field in the metal of the conductor is zero, so the external field must induce a charge separation in the conductor and this charge separation produces a field that cancels out the external field within the metal of the shell (shaded blue in the diagram). However, there is no obvious reason why the field should also be canceled to zero in the interior of the shell.

Although it is widely stated in introductions to electrostatics that the field is zero in the interior of the shell I cannot find proof of this. So the question is how we prove that field inside the shell is always zero whatever the external field and shape of the shell?

In many introductory books on electrostatics, you can find the statement that the field inside a conducting shell is zero if there are no charges within the shell. For example, if we place an uncharged conducting sphere in a uniform electric field we would get something like this:

Field

For simplicity, I have drawn a uniform external field and a spherical shell, but the internal field is zero for any external field and any shape of the shell.

We know the field in the metal of the conductor is zero, so the external field must induce a charge separation in the conductor and this charge separation produces a field that cancels out the external field within the metal of the shell (shaded blue in the diagram). However, there is no obvious reason why the field should also be canceled to zero in the interior of the shell.

Although it is widely stated in introductions to electrostatics that the field is zero in the interior of the shell I cannot find proof of this. So the question is how we prove that field inside the shell is always zero whatever the external field and shape of the shell?

Notice removed Canonical answer required by John Rennie
Bounty Ended with Chiral Anomaly's answer chosen by John Rennie
improved grammar
Source Link

In many introductory books on electrostatics, you can find the statement that the field inside a conducting shell is zero if there are no charges within the shell. For example, if we place an uncharged conducting sphere in a uniform electric field we would get something like this:

Field

For simplicity, I have drawn a uniform external field and a spherical shell, but the internal field is zero for any external field and any shape of the shell.

We know the field in the metal of the conductor is zero, so the external field must induce a charge separation in the conductor and this charge separation produces a field that cancels out the external field within the metal of the shell (shaded blue in the diagram). However, there is no obvious reason why the field should also be cancelledcanceled to zero in the interior of the shell.

Although it is widely stated in introductions to electrostatics that the field is zero in the interior of the shell I cannot find a proof of this. So the question is how we prove that field inside the shell is always zero whatever the external field and shape of the shell?

In many introductory books on electrostatics you can find the statement that the field inside a conducting shell is zero if there are no charges within the shell. For example if we place an uncharged conducting sphere in a uniform electric field we would get something like this:

Field

For simplicity I have drawn a uniform external field and a spherical shell, but the internal field is zero for any external field and any shape of shell.

We know the field in the metal of the conductor is zero, so the external field must induce a charge separation in the conductor and this charge separation produces a field that cancels out the external field within the metal of the shell (shaded blue in the diagram). However there is no obvious reason why the field should also be cancelled to zero in the interior of the shell.

Although it is widely stated in introductions to electrostatics that the field is zero in the interior of the shell I cannot find a proof of this. So the question is how we prove that field inside the shell is always zero whatever the external field and shape of the shell?

In many introductory books on electrostatics, you can find the statement that the field inside a conducting shell is zero if there are no charges within the shell. For example, if we place an uncharged conducting sphere in a uniform electric field we would get something like this:

Field

For simplicity, I have drawn a uniform external field and a spherical shell, but the internal field is zero for any external field and any shape of the shell.

We know the field in the metal of the conductor is zero, so the external field must induce a charge separation in the conductor and this charge separation produces a field that cancels out the external field within the metal of the shell (shaded blue in the diagram). However, there is no obvious reason why the field should also be canceled to zero in the interior of the shell.

Although it is widely stated in introductions to electrostatics that the field is zero in the interior of the shell I cannot find proof of this. So the question is how we prove that field inside the shell is always zero whatever the external field and shape of the shell?

Tweeted twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1291796282290376706
Notice added Canonical answer required by John Rennie
Bounty Started worth 500 reputation by John Rennie
Post Reopened by John Rennie, Bhavay, ACuriousMind
Post Closed as "Not suitable for this site" by Michael Seifert, user258881, SuperCiocia, Jon Custer, Charles Francis
I now doubt that final paragraph ...
Source Link
John Rennie
  • 362.6k
  • 132
  • 780
  • 1.1k

In many introductory books on electrostatics you can find the statement that the field inside a conducting shell is zero if there are no charges within the shell. For example if we place an uncharged conducting sphere in a uniform electric field we would get something like this:

Field

For simplicity I have drawn a uniform external field and a spherical shell, but the internal field is zero for any external field and any shape of shell.

We know the field in the metal of the conductor is zero, so the external field must induce a charge separation in the conductor and this charge separation produces a field that cancels out the external field within the metal of the shell (shaded blue in the diagram). However there is no obvious reason why the field should also be cancelled to zero in the interior of the shell.

Although it is widely stated in introductions to electrostatics that the field is zero in the interior of the shell I cannot find a proof of this. So the question is how we prove that field inside the shell is always zero whatever the external field and shape of the shell?

If the field inside the shell is zero this must mean the charge is zero everywhere on the inner surface. Note that this is a stronger condition that just saying the net charge on the internal surface is zero - there must be no charge anywhere on the internal surface. So an equivalent way of asking the question is to ask why is the charge everywhere zero on the internal surface?

In many introductory books on electrostatics you can find the statement that the field inside a conducting shell is zero if there are no charges within the shell. For example if we place an uncharged conducting sphere in a uniform electric field we would get something like this:

Field

For simplicity I have drawn a uniform external field and a spherical shell, but the internal field is zero for any external field and any shape of shell.

We know the field in the metal of the conductor is zero, so the external field must induce a charge separation in the conductor and this charge separation produces a field that cancels out the external field within the metal of the shell (shaded blue in the diagram). However there is no obvious reason why the field should also be cancelled to zero in the interior of the shell.

Although it is widely stated in introductions to electrostatics that the field is zero in the interior of the shell I cannot find a proof of this. So the question is how we prove that field inside the shell is always zero whatever the external field and shape of the shell?

If the field inside the shell is zero this must mean the charge is zero everywhere on the inner surface. Note that this is a stronger condition that just saying the net charge on the internal surface is zero - there must be no charge anywhere on the internal surface. So an equivalent way of asking the question is to ask why is the charge everywhere zero on the internal surface?

In many introductory books on electrostatics you can find the statement that the field inside a conducting shell is zero if there are no charges within the shell. For example if we place an uncharged conducting sphere in a uniform electric field we would get something like this:

Field

For simplicity I have drawn a uniform external field and a spherical shell, but the internal field is zero for any external field and any shape of shell.

We know the field in the metal of the conductor is zero, so the external field must induce a charge separation in the conductor and this charge separation produces a field that cancels out the external field within the metal of the shell (shaded blue in the diagram). However there is no obvious reason why the field should also be cancelled to zero in the interior of the shell.

Although it is widely stated in introductions to electrostatics that the field is zero in the interior of the shell I cannot find a proof of this. So the question is how we prove that field inside the shell is always zero whatever the external field and shape of the shell?

Rollback to Revision 9
Source Link
John Rennie
  • 362.6k
  • 132
  • 780
  • 1.1k
Loading
Copied the wrong edit.
Source Link
Bhavay
  • 1.7k
  • 2
  • 14
  • 26
Loading
Formatting
Source Link
Bhavay
  • 1.7k
  • 2
  • 14
  • 26
Loading
Please don't drastically change the question so as to invalidate the existing answers. If you have a different question, consider making a new post, instead of rewriting this one.
Source Link
user258881
user258881
Loading
Rollback to Revision 4
Source Link
user258881
user258881
Loading
Typo
Source Link
John Rennie
  • 362.6k
  • 132
  • 780
  • 1.1k
Loading
Tweak
Source Link
John Rennie
  • 362.6k
  • 132
  • 780
  • 1.1k
Loading
edited tags
Link
Qmechanic
  • 212.7k
  • 48
  • 589
  • 2.3k
Loading
Correct diagram
Source Link
John Rennie
  • 362.6k
  • 132
  • 780
  • 1.1k
Loading
Rewrite after discussion with author
Source Link
John Rennie
  • 362.6k
  • 132
  • 780
  • 1.1k
Loading
added 90 characters in body
Source Link
Bhavay
  • 1.7k
  • 2
  • 14
  • 26
Loading
added 9 characters in body
Source Link
Bhavay
  • 1.7k
  • 2
  • 14
  • 26
Loading
edited tags
Source Link
Bhavay
  • 1.7k
  • 2
  • 14
  • 26
Loading
Source Link
Bhavay
  • 1.7k
  • 2
  • 14
  • 26
Loading