Timeline for Electromagnetic irradiation of a dielectric: Transforming the striction force equation
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Aug 4, 2020 at 3:41 | history | bounty ended | The Pointer | ||
| S Aug 4, 2020 at 3:41 | history | notice removed | The Pointer | ||
| Aug 4, 2020 at 3:41 | vote | accept | The Pointer | ||
| Aug 4, 2020 at 3:41 | vote | accept | The Pointer | ||
| Aug 4, 2020 at 3:41 | |||||
| Aug 4, 2020 at 2:04 | answer | added | atarasenko | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 4, 2020 at 0:57 | comment | added | The Pointer | @atarasenko Oh wow, I think you're right. Thank you for that. Looking through that Wikipedia article, I think I was on the right track with $\nabla \left[ \left( \rho \dfrac{\partial{\epsilon}}{\partial{\rho}} \right)_T \dfrac{\langle \mathbf{E}^2 \rangle}{8 \pi} \right] = \nabla \left[ \left( \rho \dfrac{\partial{n^2}}{\partial{\rho}} \right)_T \dfrac{I}{4 \pi c n \epsilon_0} \right]$! But which formula in particular should I be using? The closest that I can see might be $\mu _{0}\varepsilon _{0} = 1/c^{2}$, but this still doesn't get us what we need. Do you know enough to post an answer? | |
| Aug 4, 2020 at 0:37 | comment | added | atarasenko | The formula you are trying to prove is written in gaussian units (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_units), and equations that contain $\epsilon_0$ and $\mu_0$ are written in SI units. | |
| Aug 3, 2020 at 9:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1290210816751480832 | ||
| S Jul 31, 2020 at 3:43 | history | bounty started | The Pointer | ||
| S Jul 31, 2020 at 3:43 | history | notice added | The Pointer | Draw attention | |
| Jul 28, 2020 at 18:15 | history | edited | The Pointer | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 18 characters in body
|
| Jul 28, 2020 at 18:08 | history | asked | The Pointer | CC BY-SA 4.0 |