Timeline for Relationship between classical $q$-deformed General Relativity and the cosmological constant
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 14, 2020 at 13:49 | comment | added | MadMax | @Prof.Legolasov, actually it's adding the non-commuting $e^K$ (rather than $\varepsilon_{IJKL} e^K \wedge e^L$) to $\omega_{IJ}$, since the q-deformed connection is required to be a 1-form ( $\varepsilon_{IJKL} e^K \wedge e^L$ is 2-form). You can rewrite the q-deformed connection $\omega^I_{\;J} + qe^K=\omega^I_{\;J} + qe^K_{\;4} = \omega^a_{q\;b}$, with $a,b = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4$. | |
Jul 14, 2020 at 10:41 | vote | accept | Prof. Legolasov | ||
Jul 14, 2020 at 2:25 | comment | added | Prof. Legolasov | I think I understand the intuition. $\varepsilon_{IJKL} e^K \wedge e^L$ is canonically conjugate to $\omega_{IJ}$, so it doesn’t commute with it and adding it to $\omega$ will make it a quantum group connection. Is that what you meant? | |
Jul 13, 2020 at 19:43 | history | edited | MadMax | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 84 characters in body
|
Jul 13, 2020 at 18:56 | comment | added | MadMax | The dS (q-deformed Lorentz) connection has two parts $\omega^I_{\;J} + q e^I$. | |
Jul 13, 2020 at 18:49 | comment | added | Prof. Legolasov | Nice! How does $e$ make it into the $q$-deformed curvature though? | |
Jul 13, 2020 at 17:37 | history | edited | MadMax | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
Jul 13, 2020 at 17:30 | history | answered | MadMax | CC BY-SA 4.0 |