Timeline for Faraday's Law and magnetic monopoles
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2013 at 7:35 | history | edited | dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
FIx latex markup, punctuation, and markdown for italics
|
| Mar 9, 2013 at 18:27 | vote | accept | cipher | ||
| Mar 9, 2013 at 11:12 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 9, 2013 at 10:55 | answer | added | N. Virgo | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 9, 2013 at 10:52 | comment | added | twistor59 | Yep, what Michael Brown said: In a statement of Faraday's law you typically have a wire loop and integrate over the surface it bounds. In the "no monopoles statement" you integrate over a closed surface surrounding the would-be monopole. | |
| Mar 9, 2013 at 10:49 | comment | added | Michael | In one case you're integrating over a closed surface, in the other over an open surface. | |
| Mar 9, 2013 at 10:47 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 9, 2013 at 11:03 | |||||
| Mar 9, 2013 at 10:27 | history | asked | cipher | CC BY-SA 3.0 |