Timeline for Disadvantages of dimensional regularization as a regularization method
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2021 at 22:25 | comment | added | Artem Alexandrov | In addition to this answer, I would like to add my own experience: dim-reg scheme does not work for odd divergences, see this | |
| Jun 29, 2020 at 9:36 | vote | accept | Bastam Tajik | ||
| Jun 29, 2020 at 9:36 | |||||
| Jun 26, 2020 at 14:59 | comment | added | Bastam Tajik | Is there any observable quantity that ensures us that the dimension of spacetime is an absolute integer? If not it cannot be objected in this regard, unless one finds some observables that whose dependence on epsilon is not "renormalizable" in other words epsilon can't be deleted to find an observable theoretically. | |
| Jun 25, 2020 at 18:14 | comment | added | Oбжорoв | You find that description of our world with non-integer dimensions can be “physically” unbeatable, rather than a mathematical trick? | |
| Jun 21, 2020 at 18:10 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added references
|
| Jun 21, 2020 at 17:50 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added explanation
|
| Jun 21, 2020 at 17:41 | comment | added | Bastam Tajik | The inconsistency arises as the answer of the link you attached, from dimensions less than 3. I was thinking if such inconsistencies arise in the case of d=4? And does it lead to any physical problem? Like, violation of Lorentz invariance or gauge invariance etc? | |
| Jun 21, 2020 at 17:13 | history | answered | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |