Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 4, 2020 at 4:31 answer added Diógenes Figueroa timeline score: 1
Jun 17, 2020 at 19:49 comment added Cosmas Zachos I suspect this is between you and your instructor. A pure imaginary width is what you do expect to get for impossible real decays.
Jun 17, 2020 at 19:23 comment added Riz Do @CosmasZachos , ok I guess i havent expected it to be in units of energy. So i understand that part now. But if I am below treshold for decay, how do i get the width expressed with a number with appropriate units? It should be possible as it is part of a problem question.
Jun 17, 2020 at 19:12 comment added probably_someone The decay rate has units of either energy (as the "decay width") or time$^{-1}$. You're not going to get a pure number out.
Jun 17, 2020 at 18:47 history edited Qmechanic CC BY-SA 4.0
added 3 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Jun 17, 2020 at 18:46 comment added Cosmas Zachos $m_e$?? where did that come from? In natural units, $\hbar=1$ and the width is in GeVs. But, do you understand you are below threshold for decay?
Jun 17, 2020 at 18:30 review First posts
Jun 17, 2020 at 19:11
Jun 17, 2020 at 18:19 history asked Riz Do CC BY-SA 4.0