Timeline for Hydrogen atom and scale transformation for radial variable
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2020 at 17:00 | comment | added | Superfast Jellyfish | Right! Thanks @Thomas | |
| Jun 7, 2020 at 17:00 | history | edited | Superfast Jellyfish | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Jun 7, 2020 at 16:48 | comment | added | Thomas Fritsch | In the formula for $a_0$ it should be $m_e$, not $m_e^2$. | |
| Jun 7, 2020 at 16:30 | comment | added | Superfast Jellyfish | Yes. To get the exact Bohr radius it is relevant. But you get the order of magnitude of the lengthscale to a good estimate by this. Basically what’s the domain of validity of the theory. Remaining (exact) value is determined out of the calculation as @StephenG pointed out in his answer. | |
| Jun 7, 2020 at 16:22 | comment | added | Barry | Yes, I thought of that but relevant constants in the problem which have dimensions are Epsilon, h, e, Me so dimensional analysis will give a distance without a factor of 4pi.we say that there should be 4pi because we know actual value of 4pi?right? | |
| Jun 7, 2020 at 15:40 | history | answered | Superfast Jellyfish | CC BY-SA 4.0 |