Timeline for Distinction between contraction and application of a tensor in abstract index notation
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2020 at 6:36 | review | First posts | |||
| May 13, 2020 at 6:43 | |||||
| May 11, 2020 at 21:41 | comment | added | Victor Gustavo May | Thank you for your answer, but my question was about what the translation of the definition of the tensor would be in non-index notation? I think I could have made that clearer. For that I apologize, I will up-vote your answer since it was helpful. I successfully wrote a translation in index free notation that the contraction definition really defines a unique tensor. The proof was almost immediate, but doing it made evident an important observation that I missed when getting into the Abstact Index Notation. | |
| May 11, 2020 at 20:50 | history | edited | Urb | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 57 characters in body
|
| May 11, 2020 at 20:44 | history | answered | Urb | CC BY-SA 4.0 |