Skip to main content
added 12 characters in body
Source Link
G. Smith
  • 52.2k
  • 4
  • 85
  • 154

When you quantize Maxwell’s equations to get QED, the equations still hold. All that changes is the meaning of the potentials and fields; they are now quantum-mechanical operators. The field of a charge still extends arbitrarily far from the charge.

In fact, the quantum electromagnetic field exists even when there are no charges and no photons. For example, it has “quantum fluctuations” in the vacuum state. And a Big Bang does not require charges to produce photons; expanding spacetime is sufficient to produce them. (By the way, the quantum electron-positron field similarly exists when there are no electrons or positrons. Fields are more fundamental than particles, at least in mymany physicists’ ontology.)

Your conception of photons as being the field is incorrect. They are the quanta of the field. These quanta interact with matter as point particles, but the quantum field that they are quanta of exists everywhere, just like classical field in classical electromagnetism.

Finally, each charge does not have its own field. There is only only one quantum EM field pervading the universe, and all photons in the universe are quanta of this one field.

When you quantize Maxwell’s equations to get QED, the equations still hold. All that changes is the meaning of the potentials and fields; they are now quantum-mechanical operators. The field of a charge still extends arbitrarily far from the charge.

In fact, the quantum electromagnetic field exists even when there are no charges. For example, it has “quantum fluctuations” in the vacuum state. And a Big Bang does not require charges to produce photons; expanding spacetime is sufficient to produce them. (By the way, the quantum electron-positron field exists when there are no electrons or positrons. Fields are more fundamental than particles, at least in my ontology.)

Your conception of photons as being the field is incorrect. They are the quanta of the field. These quanta interact with matter as point particles, but the quantum field that they are quanta of exists everywhere, just like classical field in classical electromagnetism.

Finally, each charge does not have its own field. There is only only one quantum EM field pervading the universe, and all photons in the universe are quanta of this one field.

When you quantize Maxwell’s equations to get QED, the equations still hold. All that changes is the meaning of the potentials and fields; they are now quantum-mechanical operators. The field of a charge still extends arbitrarily far from the charge.

In fact, the quantum electromagnetic field exists even when there are no charges and no photons. For example, it has “quantum fluctuations” in the vacuum state. And a Big Bang does not require charges to produce photons; expanding spacetime is sufficient to produce them. (By the way, the quantum electron-positron field similarly exists when there are no electrons or positrons. Fields are more fundamental than particles, at least in many physicists’ ontology.)

Your conception of photons as being the field is incorrect. They are the quanta of the field. These quanta interact with matter as point particles, but the quantum field that they are quanta of exists everywhere, just like classical field in classical electromagnetism.

Finally, each charge does not have its own field. There is only only one quantum EM field pervading the universe, and all photons in the universe are quanta of this one field.

added 8 characters in body
Source Link
G. Smith
  • 52.2k
  • 4
  • 85
  • 154

When you quantize Maxwell’s equations to get QED, the equations still hold. All that changes is the meaning of the potentials and fields; they are now quantum-mechanical operators. The field of a charge still extends arbitrarily far from the charge.

In fact, the quantum electromagnetic field exists even when there are no charges. For example, it has “quantum fluctuations” in the vacuum state. And a Big Bang does not require charges to produce photons; expanding spacetime is sufficient to produce them. (By the way, the quantum electron-positron field exists when there are no electrons or positrons. Fields are more fundamental than particles, at least in my ontology.)

Your conception of photons as being the field is incorrect. They are the quanta of the field. These quanta interact with matter as point particles, but the quantum field that they are quanta of exists everywhere, just like classical field in classical electromagnetism.

Finally, each charge does not have its own field. There is only only one quantum EM field pervading the universe, and all photons in the universe are quanta of this one field.

When you quantize Maxwell’s equations to get QED, the equations still hold. All that changes is the meaning of the potentials and fields; they are now quantum-mechanical operators. The field of a charge still extends arbitrarily far from the charge.

In fact, the electromagnetic field exists even when there are no charges. For example, it has “quantum fluctuations” in the vacuum state. And a Big Bang does not require charges to produce photons; expanding spacetime is sufficient to produce them.

Your conception of photons as being the field is incorrect. They are the quanta of the field. These quanta interact with matter as point particles, but the quantum field that they are quanta of exists everywhere, just like classical field in classical electromagnetism.

Finally, each charge does not have its own field. There is only only one quantum EM field pervading the universe, and all photons in the universe are quanta of this one field.

When you quantize Maxwell’s equations to get QED, the equations still hold. All that changes is the meaning of the potentials and fields; they are now quantum-mechanical operators. The field of a charge still extends arbitrarily far from the charge.

In fact, the quantum electromagnetic field exists even when there are no charges. For example, it has “quantum fluctuations” in the vacuum state. And a Big Bang does not require charges to produce photons; expanding spacetime is sufficient to produce them. (By the way, the quantum electron-positron field exists when there are no electrons or positrons. Fields are more fundamental than particles, at least in my ontology.)

Your conception of photons as being the field is incorrect. They are the quanta of the field. These quanta interact with matter as point particles, but the quantum field that they are quanta of exists everywhere, just like classical field in classical electromagnetism.

Finally, each charge does not have its own field. There is only only one quantum EM field pervading the universe, and all photons in the universe are quanta of this one field.

added 4 characters in body
Source Link
G. Smith
  • 52.2k
  • 4
  • 85
  • 154

When you quantize Maxwell’s equations to get QED, the equations still hold. All that changes is the meaningmeaning of the potentials and fields; they are now quantum-mechanical operators. The field of a charge still extends arbitrarily far from the charge.

In fact, the electromagnetic field exists even when there are no charges. For example, it has “quantum fluctuations” in the vacuum state. And a Big Bang does not require charges to produce photons; expanding spacetime is sufficient to produce them.

Your conception of photons as being the field is incorrect. They are the quantaquanta of the field. TheThese quanta interact with matter as point particles, but the quantum field that they are quanta of exists everywhereeverywhere, just like classical field in classical electromagnetism.

Finally, each charge does not have its own field. There is only only one quantum EM field pervading the universe, and all photons in the universe are quanta of this oneone field.

When you quantize Maxwell’s equations to get QED, the equations still hold. All that changes is the meaning of the potentials and fields; they are now quantum-mechanical operators. The field of a charge still extends arbitrarily far from the charge.

In fact, the electromagnetic field exists even when there are no charges. For example, it has “quantum fluctuations” in the vacuum state. And a Big Bang does not require charges to produce photons; expanding spacetime is sufficient to produce them.

Your conception of photons as being the field is incorrect. They are the quanta of the field. The quanta interact with matter as point particles, but the quantum field exists everywhere, just like classical field in classical electromagnetism.

Finally, each charge does not have its own field. There is only only one quantum EM field pervading the universe, and all photons are quanta of this one field.

When you quantize Maxwell’s equations to get QED, the equations still hold. All that changes is the meaning of the potentials and fields; they are now quantum-mechanical operators. The field of a charge still extends arbitrarily far from the charge.

In fact, the electromagnetic field exists even when there are no charges. For example, it has “quantum fluctuations” in the vacuum state. And a Big Bang does not require charges to produce photons; expanding spacetime is sufficient to produce them.

Your conception of photons as being the field is incorrect. They are the quanta of the field. These quanta interact with matter as point particles, but the quantum field that they are quanta of exists everywhere, just like classical field in classical electromagnetism.

Finally, each charge does not have its own field. There is only only one quantum EM field pervading the universe, and all photons in the universe are quanta of this one field.

added 74 characters in body
Source Link
G. Smith
  • 52.2k
  • 4
  • 85
  • 154
Loading
Source Link
G. Smith
  • 52.2k
  • 4
  • 85
  • 154
Loading