Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 19, 2013 at 15:26 vote accept 71GA
Feb 9, 2013 at 4:42 answer added Freedom timeline score: 3
Feb 8, 2013 at 22:09 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/300003387427131392
Feb 8, 2013 at 17:05 comment added 71GA In my oppinnion expression "wave function" suits $\psi$ way better than "probability amplitude". Later is confusing. I would name $\psi_0$ "probability amplitude" instead. These names are ridiculously confusing and should be changed! I mean in a plane wave here en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plane_wave we have $A=A_0 e^{i(kx - \omega t)}$ where $A_0$ is called "amplitude". So if i have a $\psi = \psi_0 e^{i(kx - \omega t)}$ which in some way describes probability only logical thing would be to name $\psi_0$ "probability amplitude".
Feb 8, 2013 at 16:12 comment added Řídící Probability amplitudes (like probabilities) are unitless. Square or multiply them and the result remains unitless. So, no worries there.
Feb 8, 2013 at 15:40 answer added JKL timeline score: 7
Feb 8, 2013 at 15:31 history edited Qmechanic CC BY-SA 3.0
retagged; layout;
Feb 8, 2013 at 14:53 comment added Kenshin It's called normalisation factor.
Feb 8, 2013 at 14:53 comment added Luboš Motl It's the absolute value of the probability amplitude. Why would you want an easier name for that? It's very important in quantum mechanics that the probability amplitudes are complex numbers. In the particular example you mentioned, a plane wave, the factor $\psi_0$ is moreover a totally irrelevant normalization factor. It's determined by conventions and/or by the requirement that the total probability is equal to one (which isn't possible for a plane wave in infinite space).
Feb 8, 2013 at 14:29 history asked 71GA CC BY-SA 3.0