Timeline for What is the vector representation of $\mathrm{SO}(6)$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2020 at 11:32 | comment | added | Étienne Bézout | Alright, thanks! | |
| Feb 13, 2020 at 11:31 | comment | added | user21299 | Yes, for $so(\dots)$ things. "Fundamental representation" can be ambiguous in the presence of exceptional isomorphisms for low rank algebras, notably in this very case of $su(4)\cong so(6)$ (as Lie algebras). | |
| Feb 13, 2020 at 11:27 | comment | added | Étienne Bézout | Thanks! Yes, it seems to be the case from the context. Is this terminology standard? It seems a bit strange. In another place in the same paper, they talk about the fundamental representation, which seems to refer to the same thing. It seems to me it would be better to use the term defining representation. | |
| Feb 13, 2020 at 11:24 | vote | accept | Étienne Bézout | ||
| Feb 13, 2020 at 10:57 | history | answered | user21299 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |