Timeline for Erratum in Griffiths Electrodynamics (wrong reference is made) [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2020 at 20:22 | comment | added | knzhou | This isn't a mistake, Griffiths is talking about equation 6 on the inside front cover, where all these results are listed for reference. (That's why they're numbered on page 21 with Roman numerals instead. "(iv)" isn't the same thing as "6".) | |
| Feb 8, 2020 at 19:02 | history | closed | Qmechanic♦ | Duplicate of Erratum in Griffith's Introduction to Electrodynamics | |
| Feb 8, 2020 at 19:00 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 8, 2020 at 18:37 | comment | added | G. Smith | Editing your previous question would have been more appropriate. | |
| Feb 8, 2020 at 18:28 | comment | added | user240696 | @G.Smith :) I don’t know what to say but I think I have done for clarification and to spread awareness also :) | |
| Feb 8, 2020 at 18:23 | comment | added | G. Smith | Yes, that is a valid erratum. But you didn’t ask a question. | |
| Feb 8, 2020 at 18:17 | history | asked | user240696 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |