Return to Answer

Emphasis on naive here. Nothing I said was wrong. However, my comment was incomplete because it left out the effects of single-slit diffraction.

Emphasis on naive here. Most of what I said was true, but the conclusion about intensity is false. My comment was incomplete because it left out the effects of single-slit diffraction.

I find it really interesting how both reasonings, despite begin so distinct, end up giving you the exact same conclusion.

I find it really interesting how both reasonings, despite being so distinct, end up giving you the exact same conclusion.

I find it really interesting how both reasonings, despite begin so distinct, end up giving you the exact same conclusion.