Skip to main content
Physics

Return to Question

added 4 characters in body
Source Link
Mathieu Krisztian
Mathieu Krisztian
  • 843
  • 10
  • 29

The neutrino mass hierarchies are made of two hypotheses/scenarios:

  • the normal hierarchy: $m1<m2<m3$
  • the inverted hierarchy: $m3<m1<m2$

Why neutrino mass hierarchy scenario do not include also the cases:

  • $m2<m1<m3$?

  • $m3<m2<m1$?

I have seen the post: Neutrino mass hierarchy

but two people are in contradiction and there was no conclusion on who is right. @SRS is saying in this thread that it is a convention to have m1<m2$m_1<m_2$. Is he right? wrong? Is there a proof of the convention from a statement in a document?

The neutrino mass hierarchies are made of two hypotheses/scenarios:

  • the normal hierarchy: $m1<m2<m3$
  • the inverted hierarchy: $m3<m1<m2$

Why neutrino mass hierarchy scenario do not include also the cases:

  • $m2<m1<m3$?

  • $m3<m2<m1$?

I have seen the post: Neutrino mass hierarchy

but two people are in contradiction and there was no conclusion on who is right. @SRS is saying in this thread that it is a convention to have m1<m2. Is he right? wrong? Is there a proof of the convention from a statement in a document?

The neutrino mass hierarchies are made of two hypotheses/scenarios:

  • the normal hierarchy: $m1<m2<m3$
  • the inverted hierarchy: $m3<m1<m2$

Why neutrino mass hierarchy scenario do not include also the cases:

  • $m2<m1<m3$?

  • $m3<m2<m1$?

I have seen the post: Neutrino mass hierarchy

but two people are in contradiction and there was no conclusion on who is right. @SRS is saying in this thread that it is a convention to have $m_1<m_2$. Is he right? wrong? Is there a proof of the convention from a statement in a document?

deleted 21 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Source Link
Qmechanic ♦
Qmechanic ♦
  • 213.1k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k

Why neutrino mass hierarchy scenario do not include the case m2<m1<m3$m_2<m_1<m_3$ and the case m3<m2<m1$m_3<m_2<m_1$?

The neutrino mass hierarchies are made of two hypotheses/scenarios  : -the normal hierarchy : m1<m2<m3 -the inverted hierarchy : m3<m1<m2

  • the normal hierarchy: $m1<m2<m3$
  • the inverted hierarchy: $m3<m1<m2$

Why neutrino mass hierarchy scenario do not include also the cases: -m2<m1<m3 -m3<m2<m1

?

  • $m2<m1<m3$?

  • $m3<m2<m1$?

I have seen the post  : Neutrino mass hierarchyNeutrino mass hierarchy

but two people are in contradiction and there was no conclusion on who is right. @SRS is saying in this thread that it is a convention to have m1<m2. Is he right  ? wrong  ? Is there a proof of the convention from a statement in a document  ?

Why neutrino mass hierarchy scenario do not include the case m2<m1<m3 and the case m3<m2<m1?

The neutrino mass hierarchies are made of two hypotheses/scenarios  : -the normal hierarchy : m1<m2<m3 -the inverted hierarchy : m3<m1<m2

Why neutrino mass hierarchy scenario do not include also the cases: -m2<m1<m3 -m3<m2<m1

?

I have seen the post  : Neutrino mass hierarchy

but two people are in contradiction and there was no conclusion on who is right. @SRS is saying in this thread that it is a convention to have m1<m2. Is he right  ? wrong  ? Is there a proof of the convention from a statement in a document  ?

Why neutrino mass hierarchy scenario do not include the case $m_2<m_1<m_3$ and the case $m_3<m_2<m_1$?

The neutrino mass hierarchies are made of two hypotheses/scenarios:

  • the normal hierarchy: $m1<m2<m3$
  • the inverted hierarchy: $m3<m1<m2$

Why neutrino mass hierarchy scenario do not include also the cases:

  • $m2<m1<m3$?

  • $m3<m2<m1$?

I have seen the post: Neutrino mass hierarchy

but two people are in contradiction and there was no conclusion on who is right. @SRS is saying in this thread that it is a convention to have m1<m2. Is he right? wrong? Is there a proof of the convention from a statement in a document?

Source Link
Mathieu Krisztian
Mathieu Krisztian
  • 843
  • 10
  • 29

Why neutrino mass hierarchy scenario do not include the case m2<m1<m3 and the case m3<m2<m1?

The neutrino mass hierarchies are made of two hypotheses/scenarios : -the normal hierarchy : m1<m2<m3 -the inverted hierarchy : m3<m1<m2

Why neutrino mass hierarchy scenario do not include also the cases: -m2<m1<m3 -m3<m2<m1

?

I have seen the post : Neutrino mass hierarchy

but two people are in contradiction and there was no conclusion on who is right. @SRS is saying in this thread that it is a convention to have m1<m2. Is he right ? wrong ? Is there a proof of the convention from a statement in a document ?