Timeline for Vertex algebra confusion
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2020 at 11:54 | vote | accept | Sounak Sinha | ||
| Jan 1, 2020 at 11:54 | comment | added | Sounak Sinha | Yes it's working, thanks for the answer. | |
| Jan 1, 2020 at 10:42 | comment | added | Nikita | @SounakSinha, I added details to answer | |
| Jan 1, 2020 at 10:41 | history | edited | Nikita | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 285 characters in body
|
| Jan 1, 2020 at 10:18 | comment | added | Sounak Sinha | Even the holomorphic component of the stress tensor, $T(z)$ has an OPE with a antichiral field $\bar{\phi}(\bar{z})$ (see equation (2.40) and assume $\phi$ depends only on $\bar{z}$). So how can the holomorphic generators of the EM tensor commute with the Laurent modes of an anti chiral field? If you follow the calculation on page 27 with one of the EM tensor modes replaced by a field mode, shouldn't you get a non zero answer? | |
| Jan 1, 2020 at 10:09 | history | answered | Nikita | CC BY-SA 4.0 |