Skip to main content
Physics

Return to Question

Post Closed as "Not suitable for this site" by Jon Custer, ZeroTheHero, GiorgioP-DoomsdayClockIsAt-90, John Rennie, Kyle Kanos
added 1 character in body; edited title
Source Link
stackexchange_k
stackexchange_k
  • 1
  • 5

Can’t we explain well the result of the Michelson–Morley experiment only with the GalileiGalilean transformation?

Can’t we explain well the result of the Michelson–Morley experiment only with the GalileiGalilean transformation?
In other words, is the speed of light invariant with respect to inertial frame of references even though an other object than light varies its speed relative to them?

Can’t we explain well the result of the Michelson–Morley experiment only with the Galilei transformation?

Can’t we explain well the result of the Michelson–Morley experiment only with the Galilei transformation?
In other words, is the speed of light invariant with respect to inertial frame of references even though an other object than light varies its speed relative to them?

Can’t we explain well the result of the Michelson–Morley experiment only with the Galilean transformation?

Can’t we explain well the result of the Michelson–Morley experiment only with the Galilean transformation?
In other words, is the speed of light invariant with respect to inertial frame of references even though an other object than light varies its speed relative to them?

Source Link
stackexchange_k
stackexchange_k
  • 1
  • 5

Can’t we explain well the result of the Michelson–Morley experiment only with the Galilei transformation?

Can’t we explain well the result of the Michelson–Morley experiment only with the Galilei transformation?
In other words, is the speed of light invariant with respect to inertial frame of references even though an other object than light varies its speed relative to them?