Timeline for Voltage in a shortcircuit connected in parallel to a voltage source and two resistors
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2020 at 16:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Dec 30, 2019 at 11:52 | vote | accept | Álvaro Franz | ||
| Dec 25, 2019 at 18:58 | comment | added | uriyabsc | Exactly! I'm glad I've been helpful :) | |
| Dec 25, 2019 at 18:55 | comment | added | Álvaro Franz | That clarifies it even more. I guess the same is true with only one resistor then. | |
| Dec 25, 2019 at 18:54 | comment | added | uriyabsc | Thanks for the input! I think I know why you're confused; You would be right saying that the voltage between the upper 0V nodes is equal to 10V if the voltage source was connected in parallel to the branch, with no resistors. There's voltage on both the resistors on the leftmost branch! | |
| Dec 25, 2019 at 18:53 | comment | added | Álvaro Franz | Thanks a lot. I selected Ofek's answer because it is more complete, but you are the inspiration. | |
| Dec 25, 2019 at 18:17 | comment | added | Álvaro Franz | Wonderful answer. But I still do not understand the $0 V$. Starting from the ground, that's by definition of ground the $0 V$ reference. The next node is also $0 V$ because it's directly connected to the ground. But the upper $0 V$ you drew is not clear to me. There is a voltage source connected in parallel which does force a voltage difference between those points. (Of course I do not intent to say you are wrong. You are definitely right, it's me. I am too ignorant to see this) | |
| Dec 25, 2019 at 18:08 | history | answered | uriyabsc | CC BY-SA 4.0 |