Timeline for The bigger the mass, the more time slows down. Why is this?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2016 at 14:44 | comment | added | user1717828 | Three years, ten thousand views and two points? Come on, Physics SE. | |
| Jan 27, 2016 at 13:57 | answer | added | bright magus | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 27, 2016 at 9:13 | history | protected | Qmechanic♦ | ||
| Jan 12, 2016 at 18:48 | answer | added | Alex 99 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 11, 2014 at 0:08 | comment | added | Zo the Relativist | See also my answer to this question: physics.stackexchange.com/q/134097 | |
| Jan 24, 2013 at 13:01 | answer | added | Rosh | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 24, 2013 at 12:33 | answer | added | John Rennie | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jan 24, 2013 at 7:38 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
removed word unlimited
|
| Jan 24, 2013 at 6:22 | answer | added | user20179 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 24, 2013 at 3:49 | comment | added | Waffle's Crazy Peanut | BHs do have limited mass. It's just a dead star. If a star has limited mass, then how could a dead star become so unlimited..? Can't understand why you're considering it as unlimited ;-) | |
| Jan 24, 2013 at 3:47 | history | edited | Waffle's Crazy Peanut | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 7 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Jan 24, 2013 at 3:41 | history | asked | michael | CC BY-SA 3.0 |