Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 18, 2019 at 20:08 vote accept Vishal Jain
Dec 18, 2019 at 17:36 comment added aditya_stack Also, if we are analysing equilibrium reactions, it doesn't make sense to plot something as a function of time since we are more interested in how the energy, etc. changes with the composition of the reaction medium, not with how the reaction evolves with time. Eg. For most equilibrium reactions the reactant and product are at approximately the same energy, which is why they are interconvertible.
Dec 18, 2019 at 17:34 comment added aditya_stack I am a high school student so I am not sure if reaction progress is an actual variable, but based on my current understanding it seems that it only represents how much percentage of the reaction has been completed. A reaction is 0% complete if the medium contains only reactants and 100% complete if it only contains products. We could instead plot the energy or some other variable as a function of time, but then we would be involving the rate of the rxn, etc so instead we make up a variable called reaction progress that represents how much of the reaction has been completed.
Dec 17, 2019 at 23:26 answer added Chet Miller timeline score: 1
Dec 17, 2019 at 16:35 comment added Vishal Jain I haven't done so before. I am trying to follow this lecture course for context in my current lecture course on thermodynamics. This is the first time the professor in this online lecture series has drawn such a graph, I am guessing this is a physical chemistry thing. If you understand the graph, could you please post an answer explaining it?
Dec 17, 2019 at 16:28 comment added aditya_stack If you've ever plotted net energy as a function of the reaction progress in chemical kinetics, where the highest point is the (transition state, activation energy) the professor is doing the same thing but instead plotting $\Delta G$ as a function of the reaction progress.
Dec 17, 2019 at 16:09 history asked Vishal Jain CC BY-SA 4.0