Timeline for Why do we use cross products in physics?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 10, 2019 at 18:26 | comment | added | user2705196 | @Tom It has to be the cross-product because it gives the right answer. Any other product (that is distinguishable from the cross-product) will give the wrong answer. E.g. the actual force seems to be given by $\vec{F}=q \vec{v} \times \vec{B}$, so any other description will have to be mathematically equivalent to this. | |
Dec 10, 2019 at 17:45 | comment | added | jamesqf | @Tom: I don't agree that it's useless. The details of what can be modelled really belong in a Physics 101 course. (At least the technical version, if not the "Physics for Liberal Arts majors" one.) But turn the question around. While I'm not a historian of math or science, I'd guess that the only reason we even have a cross product, or a dot product, is that they arise naturally from physics, and replace more complicated methods like quaternions: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross_product#History | |
Dec 10, 2019 at 11:43 | comment | added | OrangeDog | It is correct that the core reason why they are used is because they give the right answer. That's all there is to it. Everyone else is answering a different level of "why". | |
Dec 9, 2019 at 19:45 | comment | added | Tom | This is a uselessly vague statement, how do they enable us to create models? What is it that can be modelled using a cross product? What phenomena can be described using the cross product? Why the cross product and not some other similar product? | |
Dec 9, 2019 at 3:54 | history | answered | jamesqf | CC BY-SA 4.0 |