Another thing I tried is showing that a particle on one side will never have enough potential Energy to ever cross the line $x=0$, but then I considered the starting location $\vec{r}_0=(2d,y_0)$ with arbitrary $y_0$. $$V((2d,y_0))=-GM\left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{d^2 + y_0^2}} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{9d^2 + y_0^2}}\right]$$$$V((2d,y_0))=-GMm\left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{d^2 + y_0^2}} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{9d^2 + y_0^2}}\right]$$ Then I could easily show that there exists a point on the line $x=0$ that has less potential, therefore I imagined the particle could reach that point and still have "kinetic energy leftover" to cross the line. One such point would be $\vec{r}_1=(0,y_0)$, since: $$V((0,y_0))=-GM\left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{d^2 + y_0^2}} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{d^2 + y_0^2}}\right]$$$$V((0,y_0))=-GMm\left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{d^2 + y_0^2}} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{d^2 + y_0^2}}\right]$$ From which it became evident that $$V((2d,y_0))\gt V((0,y_0))$$ A flaw in this argument could be, that the particle could never reach $\vec{r}_1$ (or any point on $x=0$ which has less potential). Another fact I can not prove.
lineage
- 2.8k
- 6
- 20
Removed unneeded references to edits. Edit history is available to those who are interested.
BioPhysicist
- 58.5k
- 19
- 116
- 193
NiveaNutella
- 145
- 16