Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 10, 2019 at 8:01 comment added JohnDoe122 Thank you again! Is there a formula for the amplitude of the gravitational wave (in the classical-ish regime i.e. the first few periods in the SXS data) that takes the spin into account?
Dec 10, 2019 at 7:57 vote accept JohnDoe122
Dec 9, 2019 at 15:20 comment added TimRias @BillKet Both eccentricity and spin precession can have that effect. Since only a handful of simulations in the SXS catalog have significant eccentricity, spin precession is the most likely culprit.
Dec 9, 2019 at 12:05 comment added ProfRob @BillKet Eccentricity can do this. See the examples in the reference I've cited.
Dec 9, 2019 at 8:12 comment added JohnDoe122 Thank you for this! So I kinda figured out this issues with frequency, but since you seem to know a lot about this, I have one more question. For some waveforms, the amplitude is not smoothly increasing, but after each period the amplitude is going up and down between 2 values (on top of the overall increase). Is this possible (maybe due to spin?) or am I just extracting the data in a wrong way. Again thanks a lot for the help!
Dec 8, 2019 at 11:08 history edited ProfRob CC BY-SA 4.0
added 665 characters in body
Dec 8, 2019 at 9:59 comment added ProfRob @BillKet I still don't know what you mean The website gives a library of waveforms for many different binaries. Good point about eccentricity. See edit.
Dec 8, 2019 at 9:58 history edited ProfRob CC BY-SA 4.0
added 716 characters in body
Dec 7, 2019 at 23:52 comment added JohnDoe122 One more question, does the fact that the gravitational wave frequency is twice the orbital one, always hold (in the Newtonian limit)? Or does it have a dependence on eccentricity?
Dec 7, 2019 at 23:15 comment added JohnDoe122 Thank you for your reply! I guess my confusion is on how do they choose the initial parameters, mainly the location of the black holes.
Dec 7, 2019 at 9:38 history answered ProfRob CC BY-SA 4.0