Timeline for Solving a differential equation using factorisation
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2021 at 19:35 | vote | accept | Sufyan Naeem | ||
| Dec 4, 2019 at 5:35 | comment | added | Sufyan Naeem | You must not haveremoved the picture because it contained something that said something like: we are going to solve this using either power series method or algebraic method. So the thought that came into my mind first had to be that the writer was trying to solve it using factorisation and then he encountered the idea of ladder operators after he factorised. | |
| Dec 4, 2019 at 0:53 | answer | added | ZeroTheHero | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 3, 2019 at 15:13 | comment | added | user104617 | The goal is to set up the ladder operators of QM; you are not solving a quadratic equation here. Hence the distinguishing nature of $a_\pm$ is clear, the factorisation of the the Schrodinger's equation is necessary, and non-problematic. | |
| Dec 3, 2019 at 12:04 | comment | added | Kyle Kanos | Also, since we have MathJax enabled on the site, I've replaced the image with the portion of the text that seemed most relevant. You can look at the history of your post if you want to add more. | |
| Dec 3, 2019 at 12:03 | history | edited | Kyle Kanos | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
replaced image with mathjax
|
| Dec 3, 2019 at 11:49 | comment | added | Kyle Kanos | Why does the RHS need to be zero to factorize something | |
| Dec 3, 2019 at 7:17 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited tags; edited title
|
| Dec 3, 2019 at 7:00 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 3, 2019 at 8:31 | |||||
| Dec 3, 2019 at 6:57 | history | asked | Sufyan Naeem | CC BY-SA 4.0 |