Timeline for Minimum time to cover distance with variable acceleration
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2019 at 8:38 | vote | accept | Dimitris Karagiannis | ||
| Nov 23, 2019 at 23:43 | answer | added | J.A | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 23, 2019 at 22:29 | comment | added | Dimitris Karagiannis | @verdelite Yes it does need to stop at the end. I updated the post | |
| Nov 23, 2019 at 22:29 | history | edited | Dimitris Karagiannis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 45 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Nov 23, 2019 at 22:28 | history | edited | M. Enns | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Improved formatting with MathJaX
|
| S Nov 23, 2019 at 22:28 | history | suggested | Sebastiano | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Improved formatting with MathJaX
|
| Nov 23, 2019 at 22:27 | comment | added | verdelite | Does it need to stop at the destination? If no, I think you need to accelerate the vehicle as much as you can until the end. If yes, you need to accelerate the vehicle as much as you can until it reaches a prechosen speed V, then at a later time, start to decelerate it as much as you can until it stops exactly at the destination. Since there is only one single variable V to deal with, you can easily optimize time with the best choice of V (apparently V will be the V with which you have to immediately start to decelerate). | |
| Nov 23, 2019 at 22:16 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 23, 2019 at 22:28 | |||||
| Nov 23, 2019 at 22:10 | review | First posts | |||
| Nov 23, 2019 at 22:16 | |||||
| Nov 23, 2019 at 22:06 | history | asked | Dimitris Karagiannis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |