Skip to main content
added 10 characters in body
Source Link
G. Smith
  • 52.2k
  • 4
  • 85
  • 154

In the kind of particle physics that is widely accepted, such as the Standard Model, quantum fields for quarks, charged leptons, neutrinos, photons, weak bosons, gluons, and Higgs exist in spacetime but are not part of the geometry of spacetime. Only gravitation currently has aan accepted geometrical explanation. The electromagnetic, weak, and strong forces do not.

In more speculative physics, the other three forces can be related to the geometry of possible higher dimensions, but there is no evidence for this.

In the kind of particle physics that is widely accepted, such as the Standard Model, quantum fields for quarks, charged leptons, neutrinos, photons, weak bosons, gluons, and Higgs exist in spacetime but are not part of the geometry of spacetime. Only gravitation currently has a geometrical explanation. The electromagnetic, weak, and strong forces do not.

In more speculative physics, the other three forces can be related to the geometry of possible higher dimensions, but there is no evidence for this.

In the kind of particle physics that is widely accepted, such as the Standard Model, quantum fields for quarks, charged leptons, neutrinos, photons, weak bosons, gluons, and Higgs exist in spacetime but are not part of the geometry of spacetime. Only gravitation currently has an accepted geometrical explanation. The electromagnetic, weak, and strong forces do not.

In more speculative physics, the other three forces can be related to the geometry of possible higher dimensions, but there is no evidence for this.

added 9 characters in body
Source Link
G. Smith
  • 52.2k
  • 4
  • 85
  • 154

In the kind of particle physics that is widely accepted, such as the Standard Model, quantum fields for quarks, charged leptons, neutrinos, photons, weak bosons, gluons, and Higgs exist in spacetime but are not part of the geometry of spacetime. Only gravitation currently has a geometrical explanation. The electromagnetic, weak, and strong forces do not.

In more speculative physics, the other three forces arecan be related to the geometry of possible higher dimensions, but there is no evidence for this.

In the kind of particle physics that is widely accepted, such as the Standard Model, quantum fields for quarks, charged leptons, neutrinos, photons, weak bosons, gluons, and Higgs exist in spacetime but are not part of the geometry of spacetime. Only gravitation currently has a geometrical explanation. The electromagnetic, weak, and strong forces do not.

In more speculative physics, the other three forces are related to the geometry of higher dimensions.

In the kind of particle physics that is widely accepted, such as the Standard Model, quantum fields for quarks, charged leptons, neutrinos, photons, weak bosons, gluons, and Higgs exist in spacetime but are not part of the geometry of spacetime. Only gravitation currently has a geometrical explanation. The electromagnetic, weak, and strong forces do not.

In more speculative physics, the other three forces can be related to the geometry of possible higher dimensions, but there is no evidence for this.

Source Link
G. Smith
  • 52.2k
  • 4
  • 85
  • 154

In the kind of particle physics that is widely accepted, such as the Standard Model, quantum fields for quarks, charged leptons, neutrinos, photons, weak bosons, gluons, and Higgs exist in spacetime but are not part of the geometry of spacetime. Only gravitation currently has a geometrical explanation. The electromagnetic, weak, and strong forces do not.

In more speculative physics, the other three forces are related to the geometry of higher dimensions.