Timeline for Co-spinors and contra-spinors
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 28, 2023 at 20:12 | comment | added | NinjaDarth | Referring to the notation set up in my reply, the 4-component spinors come out of $𝟮⊕\bar{𝟮}$, where the metric $g$ splits into $ε⊗\bar{ε}$, with $ε$ being the metric for the $𝟮$ part and $\bar{ε}$ the metric for the $\bar{𝟮}$ part. By convention $𝟮$ is deemed the right-handed helicity part, $\bar{𝟮}$ the left-handed helicity part. The distinction involves parity. For fermions with positive rest mass, the Dirac equation entails an oscillation between the two parts. | |
Sep 26, 2023 at 7:20 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added explanation
|
Nov 12, 2020 at 4:03 | comment | added | timur | I see, so for example, would this distinction become important for 4-component spinors? | |
Nov 11, 2020 at 16:38 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | Yes, for the spinors discussed here. | |
Nov 11, 2020 at 16:11 | comment | added | timur | Thanks! So the distinction between co- and contra-spinors are not as important as that between co- and contra-vectors? Namely, you would need a metric to identify co- and contra-vectors. For co- and contra-spinors, are you saying that the "metric" is already there? | |
Oct 14, 2019 at 7:48 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added explanation
|
Oct 13, 2019 at 21:19 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added explanation
|
Oct 13, 2019 at 20:46 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
Oct 13, 2019 at 18:19 | history | answered | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |