Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 29, 2019 at 12:31 history edited Professor Sushing CC BY-SA 4.0
added 63 characters in body
Sep 29, 2019 at 12:17 comment added Bob D Just a suggestion, but I would describe it as the microscopic movement associated with the interlocking of the adjacent surfaces thereby resisting macroscopic relative motion between them, or something along those lines
Sep 29, 2019 at 12:09 comment added Professor Sushing Agreed. I will try to find time to clarify my answer.
Sep 29, 2019 at 12:07 comment added Bob D That “movement” as you call it should not be confused with the macroscopic relative motion between surfaces that is normally associated with friction. That’s my only point.
Sep 29, 2019 at 10:58 comment added Professor Sushing That's not true. When the external force is applied there is a minute movement between the two surfaces which adjusts the equilibrium between all the countless interactions. As the external force is increased the tiny movement increases until equilibrium can no longer be maintained,
Sep 28, 2019 at 21:40 comment added Bob D "When the two surfaces are stationary with respect to each other, all of those individual interactions between atoms cancel each other out". You might want to consider revising this. This makes it sound like there is no friction if there is no relative motions between the surfaces. That would not be correct since you can have static friction that opposes an external force keeping the two surfaces stationary with respect to each other. The statement would be correct if you were referring to kinetic friction.
Sep 28, 2019 at 19:37 history answered Professor Sushing CC BY-SA 4.0