Skip to main content
added 350 characters in body
Source Link
Bob Jacobsen
  • 14.6k
  • 1
  • 30
  • 43

"Sound" is due to something moving slower than, well, the speed of sound. "Shock waves" travel faster than that.

Really Big explosions can create shock waves that move faster than sound for a long way, but your firecracker examples are just the usual form of sound-based noise.

The sound of the explosion is propagated by the motion of the atoms due to their thermal energy. One way to see this: Far from the firecracker, the energy of the explosion has not increased the energy of the air molecules at all: their mechanism for transporting sound energy isn't about the firecracker at all.

To put it another way: The energy of the firecracker is tiny compared to the energy of the air molecules. A cubic meter of room-temperature air is about 1 kg of molecules, each with thermal velocity of 460 m/s. That's about 100kJ of energy. The fire cracker is much, much less than that, and the sound is spread over much, much more than that.

"Sound" is due to something moving slower than, well, the speed of sound. "Shock waves" travel faster than that.

Really Big explosions can create shock waves that move faster than sound for a long way, but your firecracker examples are just the usual form of sound-based noise.

The sound of the explosion is propagated by the motion of the atoms due to their thermal energy. One way to see this: Far from the firecracker, the energy of the explosion has not increased the energy of the air molecules at all: their mechanism for transporting sound energy isn't about the firecracker at all.

"Sound" is due to something moving slower than, well, the speed of sound. "Shock waves" travel faster than that.

Really Big explosions can create shock waves that move faster than sound for a long way, but your firecracker examples are just the usual form of sound-based noise.

The sound of the explosion is propagated by the motion of the atoms due to their thermal energy. One way to see this: Far from the firecracker, the energy of the explosion has not increased the energy of the air molecules at all: their mechanism for transporting sound energy isn't about the firecracker at all.

To put it another way: The energy of the firecracker is tiny compared to the energy of the air molecules. A cubic meter of room-temperature air is about 1 kg of molecules, each with thermal velocity of 460 m/s. That's about 100kJ of energy. The fire cracker is much, much less than that, and the sound is spread over much, much more than that.

Source Link
Bob Jacobsen
  • 14.6k
  • 1
  • 30
  • 43

"Sound" is due to something moving slower than, well, the speed of sound. "Shock waves" travel faster than that.

Really Big explosions can create shock waves that move faster than sound for a long way, but your firecracker examples are just the usual form of sound-based noise.

The sound of the explosion is propagated by the motion of the atoms due to their thermal energy. One way to see this: Far from the firecracker, the energy of the explosion has not increased the energy of the air molecules at all: their mechanism for transporting sound energy isn't about the firecracker at all.